Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

>>The Pill.

Why didn’t it have the same effect in India and Africa?

They are still relatively high fertility areas.


6 posted on 01/19/2024 12:45:20 PM PST by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: FarCenter
Why didn’t it have the same effect in India and Africa?

They are still relatively high fertility areas.

First, you didn't indicate whether you mean Arab or Sub-Saharan Africa. Arabs are dedicated to having lots of kids, primarily for military reasons. Sub-Saharan Africa is still so poor that they have a lot of kids to assure some survive.

As to India, my guess (as in I don't know) is that in addition to the survivability reasons above, I doubt the pill is a widely available commodity among lower castes.

11 posted on 01/19/2024 1:30:27 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: FarCenter

India’s fertility rate is 2.05 births per woman. Below the replacement rate of 2.1

USA 1.64
Egypt 2.96
Tunisia 2.11
Rwanda 3.87
Senegal 4.45
Ethiopia 4.24
Mali 6.24
South africa 2.40
Botswana 2.84

It’s highest in the “Sahel” zone but seems to extend to the Botswana-South Africa zone.

Africa is like the USA or EUrope 100 years ago


24 posted on 01/19/2024 7:49:58 PM PST by Cronos (I identify as an ambulance, my pronounces are wee/woo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson