Posted on 12/29/2023 6:06:24 PM PST by SeekAndFind
A new California law is set to take effect in the beginning of the new year that will require police officers to inform drivers of the reason for a traffic stop before proceeding with any further questioning. The legislation, which was passed in the fall of 2022, is intended to be a significant step in addressing pretextual stops and creating more transparency.
Before AB 2773, officers were not required to immediately tell a driver the reason for the traffic stop. The measure also requires law enforcement agencies to include the reasons for each traffic stop on arrest reports. Typically, the officer would ask if the driver knew why they were being pulled over. Under the new law, this will no longer be the case.
A new California law going into effect in January 2024 will change the way police officers interact with millions of drivers and pedestrians.
California police officers seeking to stop a driver or pedestrian must now initiate any interaction by specifying the purpose of the stop before asking inquiring questions. They will no longer be able to initially ask the driver, "Do you know why I pulled you over?"
California lawmakers passed AB 2773, which Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law in the fall of 2022, to reduce "pretextual stops" or where an officer stops a suspicious vehicle for a minor offense to look for a more egregious crime, KTXL reported.
The new law goes into effect on Jan. 1 and impacts agents of the Department of the California Highway Patrol, county sheriffs and city police officers.
The new procedure is designed to reduce pretextual stops, a practice in which law enforcement officers stop a driver for a minor traffic violation or another minor infraction as a pretext to investigate a separate and unrelated criminal offense for which they don’t have the necessary reasonable suspicion or probable cause to justify the stop.
For example, an officer could stop a driver for failing to use a turn signal when the actual intention is to search for drugs or other illegal contraband. The initial stop might be legal, but the true motive is to find something else entirely without the direct evidence required to justify the investigation. Pretextual stops have been a subject of legal and public debate.
Proponents of pretextual stops might argue that they are a necessary tool for detecting and curbing crime. When officers stop vehicles for minor violations, they could uncover more serious criminal activities, which could lead to the apprehension of individuals who might otherwise evade law enforcement.
Supporters might also suggest that pretextual stops could have a deterrence effect. If would-be criminals know that a traffic stop could lead to a deeper investigation, it might cause them to think twice about engaging in criminality while driving.
By requiring officers to declare the reason for a traffic stop, AB 2773 will reduce pretextual stops, which can lead to unnecessary tensions between police and the communities they serve. Additionally, it could build more trust between law enforcement and civilians by mandating clear communication from the outset of the interaction and preventing officers from fishing for crimes without probable cause. This would go a long way toward protecting civilians’ Constitutional rights.
California’s new legislation will certainly add to conversations surrounding law enforcement and police interactions with the community. Requiring more transparency will help to safeguard people’s rights and promote accountability among members of law enforcement.
The measure will likely become a topic for debate after it is implemented. But for now, it is time to wait and see how this shakes out.
Actually seems like a good law for once.
The Supreme Court has ruled the police can lie to people.
RE: The Supreme Court has ruled the police can lie to people.
Can you elaborate on this?
“Do you know why I pulled you over?”
“Because you’re a cop.”
I hate to praise goofy California, but this is a really good law. It should be enacted elsewhere. Too often:
Police officer: License, registration, and proof of insurance.
Driver: Why did you pull me over?
Police officer: Are you trying to be difficult? Step out of the car.
And so it goes downhill from there. And what does it take to give the reason for a stop? Maybe only five seconds of the officer’s time.
Yep. Out of all the lousy laws coming to California at the start of the year, this one doesn't actually suck.
You can Back the Blue, support law and order, fund the police, whatever, but remember, at the end of the day, cops are agents of the State.
Knowledgeable LEO open the conversation with why.
Saves a lot of trouble.
> RE: The Supreme Court has ruled the police can lie to people. Can you elaborate on this? <
I get that cops (and everyone else) might say something that later on turns out to be wrong. We are all human. Unfortunately, too many cops will deliberately lie right to your face.
“You are always required to identify when asked by a police officer.” - No you are not.
“I smell the odor of marijuana coming from your car.” - But no one has smoked marijuana in your car, ever.
Etc.
It’s trash behavior on the part of the police. And it reduces the public’s trust in them. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has ruled that cops can deliberately lie to you. The precedent is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazier_v._Cupp
Now what’s to prevent a cop from lying. “I pulled you over because your driving is erratic”. A cop could use this reason or something similar to justify any pull-over. Cops are not stupid!
normally they ask you your name first to see if you are going to lie to them, and then tell you why you’re pulled over
specially if the plate returns wants or warrants...
“You smelled my donuts?”
You are required to tell the police why they pulled you over?
What if the dash cam contradicts that?
In a ghetto, some where in SoCal:
Cop: I stopped you for speeding. I need to see your license, registration and insurance.
Ghetto ambassador: I wasn’t speeding.
Cop: OK, I still need to see your license, registration and insurance.
Ghetto ambassador: why did you stop me?
Cop: because you were speeding, I need to see your license, registration and insurance.
Ghetto ambassador: but I wasn’t speeding.
Repeat ad infinitum.
Complaint: the officer did but tell the ghetto ambassador why they were stopped.
LOL
“Because you are a Newsom Fascist Pig?”
Cops are no longer your friend.
Sad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.