Posted on 12/12/2023 4:53:50 PM PST by SeafoodGumbo
The three minute video from a former top researcher at Pfizer shows that the harm from the "vaccine" is intentional.
you know you are guilty of it when you start accusing everyone else of it.
Dr. claims vaccinated will die within two years:
https://media.snopes.com/2021/05/Copy-of-Rating-Overlay-Vertical-1.png
BUMP!
I’ve always wondered why they chose the spike protein part instead of the nucleocapsid protein part. Yeadon comes right out and says this was deliberate. He’s been quite conspiratorial about all this from the beginning. If not intentional it was certainly gross incompetence. They knew the spike protein was toxic but used it anyway.
How much are you getting paid to disrupt and spread misinformation on FR for all of these years?
THE ANALYSIS
Michael Yeadon’s claim that asymptomatic cases and transmission of respiratory viruses were “invented in 2020” is contradicted by numerous studies and research articles predating the COVID-19 pandemic, as is the implication that such viral spread is impossible.
He is also incorrect in his assertion that COVID-19 is not a threat and there is no need for vaccines in order to fight the coronavirus.
Multiple scientific studies have shown that people infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can still transmit the virus despite being asymptomatic.
https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/former-pfizer-scientist-wrong-on-asymptomatic-covid-19-spread/
He’s a practicing physician in California so it’s likely he was forced to take it.
“Where are the lawsuits?”
No harm, no foul.
28 Nov: Sky News Australia: World News: EXCLUSIVE: CIA analysts were ‘bribed to change position’ on COVID-19 origins as Fauci led ‘orchestrated’ effort to undermine lab-leak origin theory
A new Sky News Australia documentary reveals further evidence of the “orchestrated effort” to push the narrative that COVID-19 had natural origins, despite intelligence officials saying it “most likely” leaked out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
by Patrick Hannaford
In the new Sky News Australia documentary, “What Really Happened in Wuhan, the Next Chapter”, Sharri Markson reveals explosive new evidence about the origins of the pandemic that brought the world to a standstill in 2020...
One public official involved in the discussions was Robert Kadlec, who at the time was the Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services (Preparedness and Response) and technically Dr Fauci’s superior.
In an exclusive interview for the Sky News documentary, Dr Kadlec told Sharri he had discussions with Dr Fauci and they deliberately decided to downplay the lab leak theory.
The former Health and Human Services official said that they wanted to avoid people making allegations about US involvement in research that may have created the virus, but that Dr Fauci was also worried about protecting his own reputation.
“(What) made that even more acute was the fact that they didn’t have good visibility into what they were doing and what they were supporting through the grants – through EcoHealth Alliance – that went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he said...
Prior to his role in the Department of Health and Human Services, Dr Kadlec was the deputy staff director for the US Senate Intelligence Committee. He spoke to Sharri about the work of Dr Zhou Yusen, a Chinese military scientist whose vaccine research may have been the cause of the global pandemic.
Dr Zhou was one of the first individuals to publish a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine, and according to Dr Kadlec the Chinese military scientist would have had to have started his work on the vaccine “no later than 2019”.
“That’s what our assessment is, and it’s based on the fact that to do what he was trying to do,” Dr Kadlec said.
Dr Zhou was found dead in “mysterious circumstances”, just months after reports surfaced of his role in the origins of COVID-19.
Pointing out that intelligence agencies suspect foul play in the death, Sharri asked whether it was possible the Chinese Communist Party killed Dr Zhou for “accidentally starting COVID-19”.
“It’s certainly possible. We considered that as a plausible possibility,” Dr Kadlec said, before adding they had “no evidence to make that assessment.”
https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/cia-analysts-were-bribed-to-change-position-on-covid19-origins-as-fauci-led-orchestrated-effort-to-undermine-lableak-origin-theory/news-story/654fc9e34a605ddc32a43b52111d0d45
Weren’t they all based on the same patents?
“I’ve always wondered why they chose the spike protein part instead of the nucleocapsid protein part.”
Because the S-protein is on the outside and the N-protein is on the inside.
Duh
He wasn’t always anti vaccine. Something happened and he turned. Was he demanding a higher share of the profits based on whatever shares he possessed and Pfizer refused? Don’t know. Regardless, the guy is a nobody built up into a somebody by the anti vaxx cultists because he gives them affirmation.
“Weren’t they all based on the same patents?”
They were all sequenced from the same S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2.
Great question.
One of many that begs an answer, with these plant $hills.
“Great question.
One of many that begs an answer, with these plant $hills.”
Which begs the next question. Why can no one refute my facts?
Well you’re full of sh*t as per usual. A vaccine using the nucleocapsid is a viable alternative to using the spike protein.
Nucleocapsid as a next-generation COVID-19 vaccine candidate
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250828/
Thank you
” They knew the spike protein was toxic but used it anyway.”
Not toxic.
I think he’s just flummoxed by the evil clown world.
“Well you’re full of sh*t as per usual. A vaccine using the nucleocapsid is a viable alternative to using the spike protein.”
As usual you do not understand your misstatements
2022:
Next generation
This perspective suggests the inclusion
Not yet viable. Inclusion, not replacement
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
