Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo
You could credibly dismiss 95% of the Federal criminal code as superfluous (at best) and unconstitutional (at worst) on the basis that the crimes should be adjudicated under STATE law.

Just one random example is 18 U.S. Code § 36 ... which is titled Drive-by shooting

What the hell is the constitutional basis for the Federal government to be prosecuting crimes for drive-by shootings?

68 posted on 12/12/2023 8:48:22 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

I have to agree with you there 100%.


72 posted on 12/12/2023 8:59:18 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

“What the hell is the constitutional basis for the Federal government to be prosecuting crimes for drive-by shootings?”

Getting Congressman elected. I wish I was kidding.

I could see such laws being relevant in D.C. or perhaps other Federal districts / reservations, but that’s about it.


88 posted on 12/12/2023 5:37:25 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson