Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Targeting costly meds, Biden admin asserts authority to seize certain drug patents
Politico ^ | By ADAM CANCRYN 12/06/2023 03:43 PM EST

Posted on 12/07/2023 5:31:55 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Red Badger

All good communist dictators eventually seize the assets of bourgeoisie businesses.

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”


41 posted on 12/07/2023 6:50:51 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy ( Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Big pharma is going to sue like hell.


42 posted on 12/07/2023 6:54:02 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unread

Actually, if you were a company on cutting edge technology, this would be the doorway to quickly exit the US...to find a country to protect your inventions. I would imagine several US companies will park their developmental labs in non-US locations. I doubt if Biden or his handlers have thought much about this angle to the issue.


43 posted on 12/07/2023 7:00:58 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
This is about getting larger donations from drug companies leading into 2024.

Yep, the the standard DC extortion system. Make the proper donations and do what we say or we will take your stuff.

"Nice patent you got there, be a shame if something happened to it."

It's also deployed against big tech.

44 posted on 12/07/2023 7:12:01 AM PST by usurper (AI was born with a birth defect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Who even knew the government had “march-in rights?” Turns out they were codified by Congress in 1980, but have never been successfully used. The bill was sponsored by Birch Bayh and Bob Dole, one of the original rinos.

Under the law as near as I can decipher, the government has the right under specified circumstances to require a patent holder to develop the patent, if they haven’t already; or to require licensing of the product to qualified applicants if it is necessary to maintain public safety, availability, etc. And if there are no applicants for licensing, the government can license itself. It will read like good politics to pander to the takers.

All very iffy, of course, but just your basic fascism at work.


45 posted on 12/07/2023 7:22:02 AM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Democracy at work. 🙄


46 posted on 12/07/2023 7:33:40 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

But at least we don’t have that would-be dictator, Ol’ Trump, seizing private property.

Here’s a clue: Forget about attracting investment into pharma R&D. This’ll foster a trend to let ABA (Anywhere But America) invent new drugs. Since the young leftists are immortal this doesn’t bother them.


47 posted on 12/07/2023 7:39:48 AM PST by Strident ("Hi, my name is Joe and I am powerless over making $#!7 up")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I know a guy whose family owned a business in Venezuela.

The government decided they had a right to seize their business “at their pleasure.”

The family left for the United States and the Venezuelan government ran their former business into the ground.


48 posted on 12/07/2023 7:43:27 AM PST by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty; ADemocratNoMore; Aggie Mama; alarm rider; alexander_busek; AlligatorEyes; antceecee; ...
Atlas ping.

And so, with the Bureau of Economic Planning and National Resources blackmailing him over his affair with Dagny Taggart, Hank signs the rights to Rearden Metal over to the government which promptly labels it Miracle Metal, all a byproduct of Directive 10-289.

49 posted on 12/07/2023 9:36:44 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Heh, that so sounds like Milton Freidman...:)

An Economically geniused giant with the wizened countenance and manner of a of a kind-hearted comedic grandfather...


50 posted on 12/07/2023 9:49:06 AM PST by rlmorel ("The stigma for being wrong is gone, as long as you're wrong for the right side." (Clarice Feldman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Big Pharma might get some sympathy from me...
First check out “Evergreening”.


51 posted on 12/07/2023 9:50:43 AM PST by Do_Tar (All my comments are creative or artistic expression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Hmm...yeah, it does sound familiar. Directive 10-289:

Point Three. All patents and copyrights, pertaining to any devices, inventions, formulas, processes and works of any nature whatsoever, shall be turned over to the nation as a patriotic emergency gift by means of Gift Certificates to be signed voluntarily by the owners of all such patents and copyrights. The Unification Board shall then license the use of such patents and copyrights to all applicants, equally and without discrimination, for the purpose of eliminating monopolistic practices, discarding obsolete products and making the best available to the whole nation. No trademarks, brand names or copyrighted titles shall be used.

In practice this doesn't protect against monopoly, it guarantees it. Here the manufacturers favored by the government will be the only ones awarded the right to produce the products involved. And only the people favored by the government will be allowed to obtain them. This is classic fascism.

52 posted on 12/07/2023 10:04:43 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Targeting costly meds, Biden admin asserts authority to seize certain drug patents

Yet the dems claim Trump would be a dictator!

53 posted on 12/07/2023 12:30:09 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Piss Off a Lib - MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

And a Hitler....................


54 posted on 12/07/2023 12:31:56 PM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Yup. Otherwise known as crony “capitalism”.


55 posted on 12/08/2023 4:33:35 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
his administration’s battle against “Big Pharma.”

Ha ha ha. Stupid chumps did their bidding and are now reaping the rewards of being useful idiots: "But we went along with the scamdemic and helped you get rid of Trump!"

56 posted on 12/08/2023 4:41:37 AM PST by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

57 posted on 12/08/2023 10:04:02 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
“nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
- 5th Amendment


It's not exactly private property if Federal $$ funded the research to develop it.

The Constitutionality of Fed $$ being used for this is where the question should be.
58 posted on 12/09/2023 7:33:43 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Not if Federal $$ is what developed it. Let these companies spend their own money and they wouldn’t have this issue. FedGov shouldn’t even be giving them money anyway...


59 posted on 12/09/2023 7:35:17 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson