Where is your evidence that safety issues during clinical trials were ignored? Given my experience with working with the FDA, the idea that a safety issue would be ignored is completely ludicrous.
We had a prototype drug. We wanted to push the prototype into human clinical trials. But before the FDA will allow that, we have to demonstrate drug safety in different animal species. So we gave the drug to rabbits. One died. The FDA would not allow us to continue any research on that drug until we could demonstrate that the reason the rabbit died would not affect humans. That one rabbit put our research schedule back about six months.
And you expect me to believe that the FDA is going to overlook safety issues in humans when they showed that much concern over a rabbit? Sheesh.
Remind me again about the rigorous trials of the Moderna jab in NEJM, which followed a full 16 human subjects for 2 months.
Or the other one in NEJM, which had eight mice.
Look, Moderna's NEW mRNA drug is inducing myocarditis, too.
Better get the rest of your propaganda fees up front.
Dingbat.
Oh, I’m sorry.
Maybe the NEJM trials were Pfizer.
Like there’s a difference.
grey_whiskers
That was beautiful.
Now we can wait for the pattern answer that says a kook misquoted facts in a way that misrepresents the data.
And only authorities (like FauxChee and exDemMom) are reliable.