Skip to comments.
Stunner: Russian navy withdraws from Crimean HQ
Hot Air ^
| October 5, 2023
| Ed Morrisey
Posted on 10/05/2023 7:12:05 AM PDT by Timber Rattler
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: JonPreston
MacGregor's a fraud and a hack.
Period.
21
posted on
10/05/2023 9:43:37 AM PDT
by
Timber Rattler
("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
To: Kazan
22
posted on
10/05/2023 9:45:25 AM PDT
by
Timber Rattler
("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
To: JonPreston
500,000 dead Ukrainian
hardly.
23
posted on
10/05/2023 9:47:47 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: Timber Rattler
and you are an empty barrel, noisy and without value.
24
posted on
10/05/2023 9:48:43 AM PDT
by
JonPreston
( ✌ ☮️ )
To: central_va
25
posted on
10/05/2023 9:49:26 AM PDT
by
JonPreston
( ✌ ☮️ )
To: JonPreston
Google the Ukrane army. Active duty and reserve is round 200,000 in the field. So if the had 500,000 KIA’d ( not wounded ) then they have a 250% attrition rate. No army has ever had a 250% attrition rate.
26
posted on
10/05/2023 9:53:09 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: central_va
Why not? They are now on their fourth military assembled from scratch.
To: NorseViking
Since the typical “butcher bill” has a killed to wounded ratio usually around 4 or 5:1 so if 500,000 KIA’s then the total caualties would be 2,500,000 WIA’d? Wow, I never knew....
28
posted on
10/05/2023 10:02:36 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: central_va
29
posted on
10/05/2023 10:08:17 AM PDT
by
JonPreston
( ✌ ☮️ )
To: NorseViking
Did you know US doctrination is that 10% (decimated) casualties puts a unit out of commission. 250% LOL. No way.
30
posted on
10/05/2023 10:08:21 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: JonPreston
The total Army strength is 500,000. So a 100% attritution rate? LOL. Nope. Didn’t happen.
31
posted on
10/05/2023 10:10:40 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: JonPreston
Ukrainian forces: (ZSU, NGU, SBGS, PSMOP) ~70,000 killed, 100,000–120,000 wounded 24 February 2022 – 18 August 2023
US estimates[69][70]
32
posted on
10/05/2023 10:17:21 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: central_va
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ukraine-russia-military-comparison-1.6365115
900,000 active & reserve in Feb, 2022
33
posted on
10/05/2023 10:18:21 AM PDT
by
JonPreston
( ✌ ☮️ )
To: central_va
34
posted on
10/05/2023 10:20:23 AM PDT
by
JonPreston
( ✌ ☮️ )
To: central_va
What it has to do with the US doctrination? They don’t have men left, press ganging grandpas, asking Europe to deport refugees, and handing summons to pregnant women.
To: JonPreston
The latest estimates on dead Ukrainian soldiers is 500,000.
I said, a link to a report. A reputable report. From a government site. Not from a post, and not from a vlog.
I've read the kind of report from unreliable sources, like you did.
Reports are that, the Ukrainian forces have suffered over 200,000 casualties, and that's dead and injured.
Reports are that, the Russians have suffered over a million casualties, dead and injured.
And, like I said, whatever the Ukrainian casualties, you have to multiply that by at least 2, since the invaders are not as entrenched as those in familiar territory and don't know the ground as well, and the people being invaded are ALL ENEMIES of the invading forces. Thus, it's only natural that the invaders would suffer much more in casualties than the defending forces.
Granted that the following is a bit dated, but it's a lot more reliable than your sources:
https://theloop.ecpr.eu/estimating-troop-losses-on-both-sides-in-the-russia-ukraine-war/
36
posted on
10/05/2023 10:21:48 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: NorseViking
Even 70k kia is ufb. No exaggertions are needed.
37
posted on
10/05/2023 10:23:55 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: adorno
I said, a link to a report. A reputable report. From a government site.So you offer a year old European blog as reputable? What's wrong with you?
38
posted on
10/05/2023 10:31:24 AM PDT
by
JonPreston
( ✌ ☮️ )
To: JonPreston
So you offer a year old European blog as reputable?
What's wrong with you? You can't read?
as of 23 February 2023 is not the same as a year old.
But, a blog with more detailed information is a lot more reputable than a simple post from an unknown page from an unknown blogger.
39
posted on
10/05/2023 10:42:27 AM PDT
by
adorno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson