[NorthMountain]

Are democrats capable of proving that the election was not stolen?

That is, of course, a logical impossibility.

The burden of proof is on those who claim that the election was fraudulent/stolen/dishonest/whatever. The problem with such proof has always been that no court will allow them to present it. This problem is MUCH older than 2020.

[FreeReign]

The burden of proof is on those who claim that the election was fraudulent/stolen/dishonest/whatever.

What?

The problem with such proof has always been that no court will allow them to present it.

Okay, you addressed the problem.

[adorno]

The burden of proof is on those who claim that the election was fraudulent/stolen/dishonest/whatever

The burden of proof is with the party making the allegations or accusations. Thus, democrats who would put Trump or Juliani on the defendant's chair, would have to prove that the election was not stolen. Plus, there were many irregularities before and after the votes were tallied. It would be up to the accusers to prove that those irregularities were not a problem at all.

Proving a negative is difficult, but, the negatives exist on both sides.