Posted on 05/30/2023 3:43:03 PM PDT by bitt
Kari Lake joined Bannon’s War Room this morning to give a big update on her election lawsuit and the newly discovered evidence that her election was rigged by corrupt Maricopa County officials.
The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on Kari Lake’s fight against the stolen Arizona Midterm election and her recent trial on signature verification fraud after the claim was remanded by the Arizona Supreme Court.
Despite massive evidence of fraud in the Midterm Election and sham signature verification, Judge Peter A. Thompson again ruled in favor of the Defendants, claiming that “level one and level two signature review did take place in some fashion.”
The Gateway Pundit recently reported on newly available records that show Maricopa County began “secret” Logic and Accuracy testing on October 14th, after the statutorily required October 11th test, and the legally required public notice was not given.
This is a smoking gun in Kari Lake’s stolen election contest. Lake attorney Kurt Olsen concluded that “this evidence would support our allegation that this election was rigged.”
However, Judge Thompson dismissed this new evidence of intentional Election Day tabulator failures before the recent trial.
The Gateway Pundit reported on new footage that shows Maricopa County employees reprogramming the voting machines on October 14th, 17th, and 18th, after their statutory Logic and Accuracy testing, so that 59% of them would fail when Republican voters came in to vote on Election Day in 2022.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Video documentation of illegal removal of the serial numbered security seals from the certified voting machines ought to be enough to prove criminality.
But not for you, I’m sure.
+1
UPDATE:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/tonight-behind-scenes-kari-lake-investigative-team-qa/
What's "proven" to me is irrelevant.
As are you.
Following the rules is not “a legal trick” just as taking legitimate tax deductions are not “loopholes.”
I guess you wouldn’t want your attorney to use the rules to get you off, nor would you expect a prosecutor to cut corners to convict someone.
The term “justice” is bandied about a lot. My guess is that most of the people using that term think of justice as the outcome they want. In fact, it means the fair application of the rule of law.
Either we have rules or we don’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.