Posted on 05/02/2023 10:18:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The court-mandated release of the documents related to what Pfizer and the FDA knew about the COVID-19 injections and when has unearthed evidence that they knew as early as April 2021 that the mRNA shots trigger adverse events (AEs) in breastfeeding babies.
In the attempt to sell the COVID-19 vaccines to every man, woman, and child under the sun regardless of risk, age, underlying health conditions, etc., the corporate media claimed repeatedly, and continues to claim, that the vaccine was either not passed through the mother’s breast milk or, alternatively, that it was but it posed no risk to babies because the “experts” said so.
Good Morning America, for its part, not only ensured the shots were safe for pregnant and breastfeeding women, but that getting injected was “crucial” for them.
Those claims, as revealed in Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review, have turned out to be craven lies, as so many claims related to Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products have, as revealed in the FDA documents (emphasis added):
[Pfizer’s] safety database was searched for all BNT162b2 vaccine cases reporting any exposure to vaccine during pregnancy (mother and/or baby) or exposure to baby via lactation from all time through 28 February 2021. A search of the Pfizer safety database identified 673 case reports. …
Of the 673 case reports identified in the search, 458 involved BNT162b2 exposure during pregnancy (mother/fetus) and 215 involved exposure during breast-feeding. …
In 174 of the 215 reports, there was no AE reported other than ‘Exposure via breast milk/maternal exposure during breast feeding’. In the remaining 41 cases, AEs were reported in the infants following BNT162b2 exposure via lactation.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
There were deaths
In most cases all that means is the mother reported that she was breast feeding after the vaccination.
There's no determination that the vaccine traveled to nor affected the infant.
And if you look at the AEs on the 41 you'll see primarily minor issues which aren't necessarily tied to the shot.
As is typical for these anti vax articles it's based on a misrepresentation of Adverse Event data.
What are the chances that the Government removes the EUA protections that Pfizer has??? I’d guess the odds to be 1 in 100 Trillion.
Pfizer could have murdered millions and the EUA is the golden stay out of jail card.
Maybe this why Pfizer wanted 75 years to release ALL their data. All victims and potential plaintiffs would be LONG DEAD by then.
These companies sided with the leftist, lying democRATs and now their deceptions will cause their bankruptcy. Fraud will void the federal liability waiver. They are probably toast.
I recall reading two reports in VAERS of babies who died and it appeared it was related to breast feeding right after mom got vaxxed. Likely a brutal death - screaming baby that ‘failed to thrive’.
PING
I looked at the AES and they did not seem minor to me.
There were 6 severe adverse events too, that’s 3.4%.
Hospitalization rates for infants (0-4) for Covid was only .06% at its highest, according to the CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7111e2.htm
IF anyone is playing down the adverse events, it’s you.
I'm not playing them down but they seem like the kinds of things that happen with infants.
What I don't see is anything indicating the mothers' vaccinations caused the AEs.
Was the rate of these events higher than in a similar population of the unvaccinated?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.