Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
That’s a whopping 19% of babies observed to have been exposed to the Pfizer vax through their mothers’ breast milk who developed adverse reactions of varying severity.

In most cases all that means is the mother reported that she was breast feeding after the vaccination.

There's no determination that the vaccine traveled to nor affected the infant.

"The remaining 215 cases reported exposure via lactation. In 174 of the 215 reports, there was no AE reported other than ‘Exposure via breast milk/maternal exposure during breast feeding’. In the remaining 41 cases, AEs were reported in the infants following BNT162b2 exposure via lactation (see Table 2)."

And if you look at the AEs on the 41 you'll see primarily minor issues which aren't necessarily tied to the shot.

As is typical for these anti vax articles it's based on a misrepresentation of Adverse Event data.

3 posted on 05/02/2023 10:41:24 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo

I looked at the AES and they did not seem minor to me.

There were 6 severe adverse events too, that’s 3.4%.

Hospitalization rates for infants (0-4) for Covid was only .06% at its highest, according to the CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7111e2.htm

IF anyone is playing down the adverse events, it’s you.


8 posted on 05/02/2023 12:43:39 PM PDT by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson