as far as I understand the process the DA only presents its evidence against the accused.
It has no obligation to present a defense. Which is why they say you could “indict a ham sandwich”
Withholding Exculpatory Evidence
from any Agency is TERRORISM.
The DA and his controller Soros, are terrorists.
But certainly not politically motivated.
This is merely a high profile case. Our system of pseudo-justice often denies jurors the taped confession, the testimony of a person not Mirandized perfectly and the narcotics, guns and stolen property found without a minutely detailed search warrant. And DA’s often withhold exculpatory evidence to hurt a defendant they don’t like-——such as Trump. Both sides in the pseudo-justice system suffer.
He is really putting his reputation on the line with this story.
Bragg and Cohen need to be jailed over this along with Soros and Pelosi etc. etc.
Pelosi hid evidence in the J6 cases as well.
Now having Bragg do so to jail an innocent nman on made up charges.
I believe such is allowed due to the “Trump exception” to all laws and norms of society.
Is that not fraud?
If this surprises you, be mad at the Sun for shining.
While it is true that there is no ‘defense’ during the grand jury, democRATS have used the ‘justice system’ to attack and kill (politically) any effective conservative. Just research the 10 year attack on Tom Delay. Delay was later quoted that if he did not have such a deep faith in the Lord, he would not be alive today.
The Party of Death and pedophiles has no conscience, no soul, and evil abounds
If he proceeds Trump should sue for malicious prosecution.