Juries, in an honest court, before an honest judge, after hearing the evidence presented by honest prosecutors. The way it's suppose to work.
“Juries, in an honest court, before an honest judge, after hearing the evidence presented by honest prosecutors.”
I don’t disagree with that part carl. But who decides who the deepstaters are? That is what is open to interpretation. Is the lowly admin in the DOJ to be considered a deepstater because of where they work or who they work for? Are they guilty until proven innocent?