“Juries, in an honest court, before an honest judge, after hearing the evidence presented by honest prosecutors.”
I don’t disagree with that part carl. But who decides who the deepstaters are? That is what is open to interpretation. Is the lowly admin in the DOJ to be considered a deepstater because of where they work or who they work for? Are they guilty until proven innocent?
An honest Department of Justice, which will have to come from an honestly-elected President. With that there needs to be whistleblowers to come forward with evidence that prosecutors can use to start to build cases against those who are to be charged.