Wow… the Liddy apple fell VERY far from the tree.
Wow, “political malpractice” is people voting on ELECTION DAY!! He’s saying that anybody who didn’t vote early is an idiot. What a defense — “you stupid people waited until Election Day to vote.”
These people are sick....and, evil.
G Gordon must be spinning.
“it’s got to stop.” The Liddy lawyer talks like a child.
I've not been following this case closely since I think the judicial system is as corrupted and rigged as the elections here in the US. My expectation was that like the 2020 elections, the judge(s) involved in this and other lawsuits would simply declare "no standing" and dismiss this case, just as happened in all 2020 cases.
The above statement though just stood out as being it's "our" fault for waiting to the actual election day to vote and therefore the result is our fault, as if we created the fraud that was perpetrated?
Nuh uh. That's a direct statement that the ballot box no longer counts. Assuming that's true, see my tagline which I've had since Nov. 2000 and never seen a reason to change. By God Almighty, it's now been proven 100% factual!
Ladies and gentlemen, it's time to party like it's 1776 all over again, 'cept this time we're not revolting against the British, we're revolting against the AZ State Legislature and indeed, Washington DC!
(we got to get back to respecting elections)
That’s some hilarious stuff right there. A real knee-slapper.
Multiple scans, ballots in automobiles, identity theft voting...
“They wait till the last second”
That last second is called election day, right?
What a useful tool the swamp has in this desert rat...
TGP and the Hofts describing what someone else says as a “bizarre rant”? They corner the market on that.
He crows and he gloats.
Every condition in life is temporary, even “victory”.
When will a decision be made?
I would like very much to see Kari win this lawsuit, but .....
Courts and their behavior are so disturbing.
The idiot lawyer described in this thread may be so confident, he thinks he can say whatever and there is no consequence.
In other words, in his mind his side has won and it doesn’t matter what anyone else thinks.
The disturbing reality is his side may win even as their arguments are dismal and perfunctory, while insulting to viewers, citizens, and voters.
I peeked in on the case yesterday and today.
The judge is stressed about how his ruling will be seen by the certain appeal.
What disturbs me and others about the Judge’s dilemma is he can rule Hobbs wins because it’s because it’s because and more because, of this and that and blah blah bullsh*t, and chances are, as long as no procedural errors or issues are unaddressed, then appeals will rubber stamp “yep.”
On the other hand, if the judge rules in Kari’s favor, the appeal may rip the judge a new one.
So it’s easy for the judge to fold in with the judiciary status quo, then go on extended vacation or leave to spend more time with family etc.
But there is one factor I hope grabs the judge by the nads and drives a ruling for a do-over. There is precedent from 1916 IN ARIZONA; I copied the old 1916 news article on a thread earlier today.
I can sense the public and leaders are done with the corruption of Maricopa, and by the Judge’s closing comments, he knows the public is out for blood. But that’s all just pissy temporary pissiness. Americans will walk around and rant, then will come the Superbowl or a nuke strike in Ukraine, etc Attention spans are short.
Pray pray I’m wrong, very wrong.
Sounds like a typical leftist. Here’s one of their techniques: when they can respond to legitimate questions, arguments, facts or evidence they make a weak attack on their opponent. The attack is weak because it isn’t even rooted in fact, truth, law or reality. It is simply a diversion meant to distract others from the winning argument. When encountering such an attack, recognize it, call it out and repeat your argument. Do not back down.
-PJ
“I think his arrogance ticked the judge off.”
The Indian-looking (dot not feather) chick who also gave a closing statement was no piker when it came to arrogance, either.
I think the judge will rule for Hobbs and toss this hot potato to a higher court.
Who knows? We are praying.
I hope Tom Liddy reaps what he is sowing.
so if republican counties throw out all early ballots by dems- republican vote counterers can say “You reap what you sow for voting early”?
And how about that witness for the defense, “Mayer” or “Mayor”. Kari’s attorney started by saying, “Mister Mayor...”. The ahole shouted, “DOCTOR Mayor!”. Who DOES that?
Just an extension of the arrogance of everyone on that side.
So he’s saying that voters who want to vote in person shouldn’t have their votes counted fairly because they should have voted before day designated as “Election Day”?? What a freaking crock.