Live with commentary:
https://rumble.com/v21qyzg-kari-lake-election-contest-trial-viva-and-barnes-live-commentary.html
I agree, and there's time to do so.
It wouldn't be much different than Georgia's runoff election.
Funny how the ballots were wrong only in mostly red areas of the County.
Election was stolen. It was obvious Kari Lake was the winner.
Bookmark!
Kari’s lead attorney is a tough gruff dude who doesn’t back off as the Communist party trash on the other side repeatedly tries to harass him.
She found a guy with the same backbone she has.
Ha....I posted that a week of so ago....FReepers on top of the news.
More like this, please.
Smart and a fighter.
Early voting (mostly DEM voters), chain of custody documents were METICULOUSLY KEPT.
Election day voting (mostly REPUB ballot drop-offs), CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTS ARE NON-EXISTENT.
This is an OUTRAGE and I hope the judge is AWAKE and acts accordingly!
These people need to be charged with treason because that’s exactly what it is.
Doubt there will be a do-over under present laws but I hope that someone has deep enough pockets to keep suing and maybe we’ll get better laws.
“…Runbeck Company, a printing corporation run by a very liberal Arizona family that strictly donates to Democrat candidates and causes.”
Hobbs just “coincidentally” awarded the ballot printing contract to a strong pro-Dem printer.
Fraud, cheating, shenanigans top to bottom by Hobbs and Co. they should DQ Hobbs from ever again holding any elected office in AZ.
Probably had the fit to page option printed locally. These should be printed at a shop. with some QA but your talking government employees. We are lucky they know what paper is.
Let’s try writing with some precision. The ballots are printed on the correct sized paper. The printed image of the ballot is scaled incorrectly - so that the bar codes and reference marks do not line up with what the scanner expects, therefore they get rejected.
There, was that so difficult?
Here are the two problems that informs me the fix is on:
1. the judge set a very high bar for the plaintiff, that she has to prove intentional fraud, which is not the AZ standard by law
2. the judge denied plaintiff’s request to inspect the ballot envelops, which would include a signature to compare with the ballot— easiest way to prove fraud
Unless someone flips on the Marxist side, proving intentional fraud is going to be tough. This one will had to the AZ Supreme Court on appeal.
And remember as our republican leaders are telling us.. If we use mail in ballots we get at least 2 maybe three more votes per ballot. Walk in you only get one.
Put these MFers on trial, and if found guilty, they should be dealt the harshest punishment possible.
and that spells.....sabotage