Posted on 12/17/2022 8:07:52 AM PST by MNDude
Another round of Twitter Files has dropped, and this one comes courtesy of Matt Taibbi (who the Washington Post laughably dubbed a “conservative journalist”).
This latest round features how deeply the FBI, DHS, state governments, and others were involved in what was and wasn’t allowed on the social media platform. Most of the focus is on the FBI.
Something that stood out to me in that email: was 100% confirmation that FB was also involved the same as Twitter. And why were they meeting with the OH Sec of State media director?
FBI had 80 agents colluding with Twitter to censor Americans.
Just imagine what the FBI is doing with Facebook (Twitter x 10) & Google (Twitter x 25).
“I stopped using Wikipedia for the same reason.”
Oddly Wiki is okay if the subject matter has no political overtones to it. If it has political overtones Wiki instantly becomes left wing propaganda.
“Jim Rob is the best thing that has ever happened for Free Speech.”
________
I’ve said this many times: “FreeRepublic is an oasis in the arid grounds of internet desert.”
These agents are worthy of investigation, and possible charges.
18 U.S.C. § 241
Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the Unites States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.
Ditto. They FBI censorship of speech in this country is unacceptable and must cease.
I love that all the Twitter whiners can now go to Mastodon and get spied on all they want…
My post was slapped down by Fascist Reddit Mods
TexasPolitics-ModTeam
ModsModerator
12/30/2022
Removed. Rule 3: Low Quality
Gateway Pundit has a reliability rating of 15, which is frankly just hot garbage. Don’t cite it here.
3. Links Must be to Quality and Original Content
Submitted articles should be worth reading. Don’t submit stub articles, stolen or rehosted content, or obnoxious websites. Associated Press reports on another website are fine.
If you’re unsure as to the quality of a source, use a checker such as this one. If a source is described as having a extreme left/right bias or low/mixed factual reporting, then it is probably not right for this subreddit.
Unsure of whether a source is good? Message the moderators!
https://www.reddit.com/r/TexasPolitics/wiki/index/rules
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.