Replies

Perhaps you learned nothing with regards to the cases Durham brought against Michael Sussman & Igor Danchenko? No case involving Trump will be won there, no matter how strong the evidence may be.

So, they bypassed the one court system that should be abolished quite frankly, and achieved getting it before the U.S. Supreme Court to be considered by them to be heard in their court.

Besides that, the scene of the crime was hardly limited to D.C. It may have been hatched there, but it was carried out well beyond the borders of D.C. Across state lines, and quite possibly across our nations borders and into the borders of foreign adversaries to coordinate with foreign actors to make the theft possible.

I mean, look at J6 and the political prisoners who have been denied their rights to a speedy trial by juries of their peers even for simple charges such as trespassing and parading. There have even been allegations of brutality & torture inflict on these same people, and nothing has been done in the form of an investigation. They will never receive fair trials where justice is supposedly blind, and only that evidence that is presented to the courts is to be considered. In reality they have been subjected to kangaroo courts rife with proprietorial misconduct. They deny them even basic rights, such as discovery by their defense attorneys.

In my opinion, the fact that it wasn't brought in the D.C. District Court was either intentional brilliance or a divine act, for it would have been shot down faster than the ink had dried on the paper.

Which would have accelerated the path to SCOTUS...

Perhaps you learned nothing with regards to the cases Durham brought against Michael Sussman & Igor Danchenko? No case involving Trump will be won there, no matter how strong the evidence may be.

I don't think the facts of this case are in dispute. It's all in the Congressional record. Without a factual dispute, the legal issues get decided on appeal, ultimately at SCOTUS.

So, they bypassed the one court system that should be abolished quite frankly, and achieved getting it before the U.S. Supreme Court to be considered by them to be heard in their court.

Which was brilliant, but if jurisdiction is lacking they are at the mercy of SCOTUS to transfer venue to D.C.

Besides that, the scene of the crime was hardly limited to D.C. It may have been hatched there, but it was carried out well beyond the borders of D.C. Across state lines, and quite possibly across our nations borders and into the borders of foreign adversaries to coordinate with foreign actors to make the theft possible.

Essentially, for all practical purposes, this a quo warranto action against the hundreds of congresscritter respondents who violated their oaths of office. D.C. is the statutory venue for such an action, and nowhere else.

I mean, look at J6 and the political prisoners who have been denied their rights to a speedy trial by juries of their peers even for simple charges such as trespassing and parading. There have even been allegations of brutality & torture inflict on these same people, and nothing has been done in the form of an investigation. They will never receive fair trials where justice is supposedly blind, and only that evidence that is presented to the courts is to be considered. In reality they have been subjected to kangaroo courts rife with proprietorial misconduct. They deny them even basic rights, such as discovery by their defense attorneys.

Ultimately, that reflects on the indifference of SCOTUS to the blatant disregard for the constitutional rights of the accused. Habeas corpus writs can issue directly from SCOTUS, although that never happens anymore. SCOTUS is more interested in "setting policy" through its discretionary certiorari jurisdiction than ensuring justice through its original jurisdiction. See Texas v. Pennsylvania. None of that grants a court in Utah jurisdiction over events in D.C.