Who pays him to write this?
French is on my Airport List.
L
Ahh, but if it does arise from a homosexual marriage -- all else must give way. And that's what opens the gates to queer lawsuits against Christians and Christian organizations.
“Those Who Think I’ve Lost My Christian Faith”
Don’t you need to have something first before you can lose it?
ping….just in case you were curious about the latest ramblings of DF….
If it is, it is because of Donald Trump, who this schmuck vehemently opposed and refused to vote for.
He’s working on his next piece, “The conservative case for not being conservative”
He is not a fellow Christian of mine. Neither is the Pope, and I am Roman Catholic.
Homosexual marriages are a politically correct joke. They don’t last long and it is verboten for academics to study the reality or collect data. Any child adopted or born into these abominations is destined for severe difficulties.
Why does he condemn Trump for what Trump did in 2000, (I assume he thinks what Trump did was sinful)?
He doesn’t condemn LGBT living happily in sin?
He should have written, Donald Trump living happily as a binary sexual man and is worthy of my respect also. Just like the happy LGBT families.
French is a fraud. People can recognize their nonadherence to the commands of Christ, and still be supporting the commands righteous requirements. True, they need to start obeying Christ, but this French guy only condemns them. Not the ones openly defying Christs commands.
My guess, is that French is hiding something from the public, that God knows about, and would expose him as a phony believer. God knows, and he is just and merciful.
French’s original background is from an ultraconservative sect of Christianity; however, I am uncertain it is still the same. I doubt it. I will just leave it at that.
Never heard of him...
Sounds, to me, like a classic dildo...
“Can you imagine waking up one morning and hearing the state no longer recognizes your marriage and that suddenly everything from medical decisions to child custody to basic inheritance and ownership rules were up for grabs?”
Thats because it never existed at all because you know, Marriage is the union between man and woman. So called same-sex “marriages” do not exist, it is an oxymoron, it is make-believe.
And the people telling you “stable public morality” requires your pain and sacrifice have also told America that a vote for a thrice-married, multiple adulterer who faces multiple, corroborated claims of sexual abuse, and who appeared in Playboy Video Centerfold: Playmate 2000 Bernaola Twins was an urgent moral imperative?
” requires your pain also said that voting for a man who overturned Roe VS Wade”
Fixed
All that he has written here supports the fact that the so called “Respect for Marriage Act” has no purpose.
The sentence he quotes may have a clear meaning to lawyers but probably a lot of non-lawyers will be a little uncertain about its meaning.
God recognizes two...and *only* two...sexes/genders.He only recognizes one kind of marriage.Anyone with a different attitude is an atheist.It’s that simple.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MZABsf4JS94/maxresdefault.jpg)
and which can easily led to exemptions for non-profits to be removed, as the men of Sodom pressed upon Lot to gain entry to his house to get at the men inside that he was protecting, so the devil seeks entry into all places that protect Biblical marriages, so that all give glory to him who perverts all that God ordained, to man's benefit.
(https://www.rainbowtoken.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/the-men-of-Sodom-blindness.jpg)
French, and other Never-Trumpers who pretend they are “conserving conservatism” by supporting the democrats, see themselves as heroes. They believe they only they can determine what conservatives and Christians should believe. And they believe conservatives should be supporting Biden and the left. What does that tell you?
There are so many of them who are the designated “conservative” at leftist publications and all they do is spout the leftist narrative. There is no difference in what they believe and what the left believes. In other words, they are not conservative at all. Instead, they are full-blown progressives. Progressives who write articles with headlines such as “The Conservative Argument for Drag-Queen Story Hour for Four Year Old Children”. Ignore them or mock them, but do not believe a word they say.
David French has beclowned himself.
That was the most torturous thing I’ve read in quite some time, and it normally is when someone is trying to make the narrow path into a wide road. Frenchy doesn’t realize his argument is with the Author of The Book, not fellow Christians. And, paraphrasing the late, great Herb Brooks, Albert Mohler should worry about is own game. Plenty there to keep him busy.