Posted on 10/08/2022 5:34:36 AM PDT by DoodleBob
Thank God for that!
We are thankful that my in laws chose NOT to get the boo$ters. They finally began doing their research, and, made their decision.
This person, who did get their boo$ter, has blinders on....and, is a FRAUDci true believer. She’s one of the many who cannot begin to imagine their own gov’t causing harm to them, via these $hots. She doesn’t do research and gets her news from network news, sadly :-(
We’re sad that she’s so ill, right now....and, are hoping she quickly recovers.
That is a big problem, hopefully as time goes on, it will lessen.
Prayers up that this person will recover.
Antone who takes any more of this crap is just plain stupid and will deserve what they get.
I think it is a civic responsibility for all liberals and democrats to get the shot to see how long they live afterwards.
Vaccines don’t alter the victim’s DNA as the CoVID experimental genetic treatment inoculations do. So referring to them as ‘vaccines’ is propaganda.
DoodleBob wrote: “Prescinding from the fact that the shots weren’t granted EUA to prevent serious illness, by what method could anyone detect that a shot prevented such a thing?”
How could one detect that the shot caused adverse reactions?
By testing it in a controlled experiment.
Oh, that's right, Pfizer intentionally injected the control group and then demanded 75 years to release their data.
Second, proving that X caused Y starts with a statistical analysis to derive a metric, like VE. It proceeds with a deeper investigation, like forensic accounting in the case of fraud, or autopsies etc in medical situations. Thus, if someone WAS to say that the shot caused an adverse reaction - which, by the way, I didn't say - there would be that two-step process.
Back to the first point.
In the words of Hillary Clinton, “move on.”
Fauci’s propaganda was effective. The masses were conditioned and controlled into rolling up their sleeves, eager for the injection of a government needle.
Fauci’s propaganda was effective. The masses were conditioned and controlled into rolling up their sleeves, eager for the injection of a government needle.
DoodleBob wrote: “Second, proving that X caused Y starts with a statistical analysis to derive a metric, like VE. It proceeds with a deeper investigation, like forensic accounting in the case of fraud, or autopsies etc in medical situations. Thus, if someone WAS to say that the shot caused an adverse reaction - which, by the way, I didn’t say - there would be that two-step process.”
So when are you going to insist that those claiming the vaccines are the cause of hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions follow your analytical approach?
There’s no cure or vaccine for the common cold because it mutates so often.
The coronavirus has been around for an estimated 55 million years.
There are four human coronavirii with two causing the common cold, another causing bronchitis, and the last causing pneumonia.
Even if it suddenly disappeared from humans it would show back up in them because animals have their own coronavirii.
“How could one detect that the shot caused adverse reactions?”
Applied common sense is one way.
Street smarts is another way.
Sarcazmo wrote: “Applied common sense is one way. Street smarts is another way.”
People are seeing what they want to see.
If you don’t eat your meat, you can’t have any pudding.
The smart ones ‘ll be better off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.