Thanks for your comment. 1945 seems like a credible site that would be acceptable to all:
Led by national security experts who are tired of the same old publications publishing the same tired ideas, our goals as we begin to try and answer this question are simple:
Accordingly, all of our writers and Contributing Editors come from very different backgrounds, many times disagreeing with one another vigorously.
[Sounds like us at FR! LOL]
What Is Our Publishing Focus or Niche?
19FortyFive seeks to tackle the issues and questions raised above through the lens of national security, defense, military analysis, and international politics through expert analysis and commentary. We also pull together symposiums with experts who often have direct policymaking experience at the high levels of government.
However, we realize that many other issues impact our core niche that we feel we must cover to give our readers the most comprehensive perspective possible.
That is why we also cover U.S. domestic politics, economics, culture, the impact of technology, and even social issues.
Editorial Guidelines
As we live in an era of “fake news” where trust in media is low, 19FortyFive does everything within our power to provide our readers with the most accurate, fact-checked, and transparently created content we can.
Our goal is to ensure what you read on this site you can trust, refer it to family and friends, and win your readership through publishing values that should be embraced by all outlets.
***https://www.19fortyfive.com/category/smart-bombs/
10 varied articles posted on this page in last 9 hrs
P.s How did 1945 fact check the stats pumped out by the UDM? Do they have fact checkers on the ground?
1945 website claims to be non partisan yet currently featutes two big fat pics of Bidensia Dementus on its home page