It still doesn't explain why so many of those who back-handedly support the shots ("praising with faint damns") follow the approach of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, down to adapting the terminology and targets ("dirty dozen"/"disinformation dozen") and emphasize first, discrediting anyone opposed to the clotshots,
first by
a) insisting that ALL claims against the shots, are necessarily intertwined, so that accepting or considering any of the claims, necessarily means that one must believe all the most radical/ridiculous claims, such as 5G/mind control
b) trying to personally discredit all those opposed to the shots, either by citing odd personal beliefs, citing personal failed treatments, or any issues with accreditation / licensure / affiliation -- and acting that such ad hominem attacks, instead of serving only as a caution, NECESSARILY repudiate ALL of that person's claims and data in toto, now and forever.
c) insisting that those pushing against the clots are hacks getting rich off of it, while ignoring the tens of billions racked up by Pfizer/Moderna
...while ignoring the thumb on the scales of the Pfizer trials (honest companies do not have a track record of tens of billions in fines / penalties since, oh, call it the year 2000, and then turn around and try to have their internal safety studies on an novel technology sealed for 75 years), as well as the renewed push for Omicron shots (170 million doses ordered) which has only been tested on mice, not humans; and reportedly only on *EIGHT* mice.
If you'd give an honest explanation of the points above, in the same vein as your post this is replying too, you'd be a taken for a Pfauci-bot a LOT less.
Sir, I have done just that consistently. And consistently I have been called every name in the book by rote and without consideration. So in the dark days I’d delta when it was bad as many of us have ever seen to be openly called a liar by some who have no idea what they are talking about that I wasnt what I say I am was horrendous. Fine don’t believe me, but the attacks were malignant and often said real doctors like Malone and McCullough are saving lives.
So instead of simply saying what their opinion was it became a crusade complete with the labels. Sir, I only swung back when I had been unjustly bludgeoned. That being said I have learned that it doesn’t have to be over the top. All I can do is explain my thoughts and what I see But to have JL and RN perpetually screech the same old attacks that are just things they can or can or prove is the ultimate in dishonest debate.
So all I can do is present the facts. And yes in those days 13 months ago I didn’t really care what I was being called. I needed the info out there. My freepmail is loaded with thank yous and support for getting the info out there. That is what kept me going.
So I am resolved to just lay out the facts. Is people wish to attack me for lying or sociopathy so be it. I know in the end the truth and I also know in the end I know it’s their credibility on full display to say things they simply cannot prove. I’d they did they would break the rules here but they would also find out every word I have said is true
Anyway thank you for your response. I continue to keep you in my thoughts and prayers.