Posted on 07/05/2022 4:54:23 PM PDT by bitt
Some highly puzzling messages were leaked to The Daily Caller from Cassidy Hutchinson reaching out to CPAC, the Conservatives Political Action Conference, for assistance with her “BS” subpoena from the Jan. 6th committee. But what does it mean?
To be honest, I’m not entirely sure, but it confirms a lot of things, and simultaneously raises A LOT of questions. For starters, why the hell is Cassidy Hutchinson reaching out to the conservative Mecca of CPAC, for help with Jan. 6th subpoena? Why would she seek conservative help if her plan was to go up there and fabricate nonsense about Trump. That doesn’t make any sense.
The way I see it, here are the 3 possible scenarios as to WHY Cassidy Hutchinson would reach out to conservatives for help:
1) Hutchinson was looking to infiltrate CPAC lawyers to get information on Jan. 6th defendants, or information to help in her smear testimony against Trump and make CPAC look bad by association. She was looking to sow division and is operating as an agent for the Dems.
2) Hutchinson didn’t want to be involved in the “BS” Jan. 6th hearings, but she was being pressured by the Dems to testify. She was sure to mention that US Marshalls, who are armed at all times, showed up to her house to issue the subpoena. So perhaps she was feeling intimidated or scared about the whole situation. Maybe she’s an unwilling participant in this sham and is being blackmailed or threatened by the Dems.
3) This is a white hat operation to bait the Dems to irrationally subpoena Cassidy Hutchinson, who claims to have the goods to bring down Trump, only for her testimony to be a colossal disaster and exonerate Trump. She’s an agent for Trump/White Hats and is playing a part to deal significant damage to the Dems and their “insurrection” narrative while simultaneously waking up normies.
She’s either involved in one of the two “sides” in this war, or she’s neutral and doesn’t know how she got in this situation and wanted out. Regardless of which option it is, this CONFIRMS that whatever “testimony” she presented is not to be taken at face value and something much deeper is going on here. None of which will reflect well on the Dems.
As for me, I’m leaning heavily to option 3. Simply too much damage being done to the Dems and the left-wing narrative to be an accident. Also Hutchinson reminds me of something we’ve seen many times before. How many people have we seen claiming to have the goods to bring Trump down, only to fall flat on their faces and exonerate Trump? Avenatti, Stormi, Omarosa. All of these similar characters did nothing but discredit the Dems and exonerate Trump. While simultaneously gathering the attention of left-wing media, therefore waking up the sheep to their dishonesty.
Also consider the timing of these “message leaks”. She’s been headline news for how many days now? And whoever had these texts waited until NOW to release them? AFTER the Dems have gone all-in on support for Hutchinson and her comical testimony.
Whether Hutchinson is directly working for the white hats or not, the result of this little stunt only benefitted Trump, and highly damaged the Dems. It makes them look even more dishonest and gimmicky, right in the prime months leading to the mid terms.
If the Deep State were pulling the strings, we wouldn’t see them fumbling this badly.
-Clandestine
https://dailycaller.com/2022/07/03/obtained-text-message-cassidy-hutchinson-called-january-6-committee-bs-before-testifying/
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
Girls like this one go where money and career advancement is. Right now she believes the democrats are where her meal ticket is and like all of these female millennial Instagram / Tik Tok heroes, she will do anything for attention.
During her testimony, HER PUPILS WERE SO LARGE HER EYES LOOKED BLACK.
I am not an expert on such matters but I have a keen eye for detail and my GUT tells me she was DRUGGED UP ON SOMETHING. Did anyone else notice her eyes? Her pupils consumed the space of her iris nearly entirely.
Anyone else with me on this?
.
The ‘White Hat’ terminology harkens back to when people said that Huber, Sessions, and Rosenstein were doing illogical things to cover for lawful “secret” prosecutions.
Conservative Treehouse exposed illogical things in the name of the Easter Bunny for 18 months, at least.
No secret 2,800 Indictments in the Desert. Not one.
.
I was puzzled when Jim Jordan would appear on TV with Meadows. I figured he was supposed to be the wise one if Jordan got wound up. Now I wonder if he was there to make sure Jordan followed the kabuki.
.
People forget this stuff is aimed at casual viewers that watch the first 8 minutes of a “News” show.
In those 8 mins, they hear people like Brett Baier calling her testimony Damning and Compelling.
The independents couldn’t tell you who Sussman and John Durham are, much less pick them out of a lineup.
There is no Truth seeking, they only want to damage Trump with the drumbeat that he’s unfit.
.
Can we TRUST NO ONE?
If the Deep State were pulling the strings, we wouldn’t see them fumbling this badly.If the Deep State didn't suck and screw up so much, it wouldn't need to be a "deep state."
If you can believe anything at patriots.win (that’s the former subreddit known as “The Donald”) she was there as a conservative plant to discredit the whole January 6 kangaroo court. Her story was physically not possible, Trump could never have even reached the driver to grab the wheel.
The Dems are notorious for recommending
Aides for Rhinos .
They are all Dem liars and spies.
The Dems are notorious for recommending
Aides for Rhinos .
They are all Dem liars and spies.
Sorry for the double post.
Sorry for the double post.
What day was Navarro on when he said this? Do you remember? I need to find that clip online.
I was thinking
5) She was trying to sell her testimony to the highest bidder.
“Everything she said was hearsay, it’s not admissible in any court even in the court of public opinion.”
In judicial court, agreed. But everything is admissible in the court of public opinion.
“If you can believe anything at patriots.win (that’s the former subreddit known as “The Donald”) she was there as a conservative plant to discredit the whole January 6 kangaroo court.”
Highly doubtful. The DS would go after her with a vengeance for queering the Jan 6 show trial.
Or in her case, some actor dressed as a squire banging two halves of a coconut shell together.
Bitch Kwazy
Way up left on the Hot Crazy matrix
Whatever it means, there will be time enough in January 2023 to reconvene the January 6th committee to complete Part Deux - the mirror image of what the Democrats did. This time focused on Pelosi, Schumer, President Elect Biden, Schiff, Liz Cheney, Kinzinger, every Democrat on the committee in Part 1, and yes, there will even be time for Cassidy Hutchinson and all her texts, e-mails and phone calls for the 2 years prior and the 1 year subsequent to 1/6/2021.
It was only 2 days ago, but i CAN’T remember what show he was on!! It was probably on NEWSMAX or FOX.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.