Posted on 06/24/2022 3:08:09 PM PDT by DFG
Recently the Democrats have coined the phrase “election deniers” to smear those who worry about our lack of ballot security, as reflected in the 2020 election, by associating them with Holocaust deniers and other cranks. But who are the real election deniers? The Democrats haven’t conceded that a Republican was legitimately elected president since George H. W. Bush carried 40 states in 1988.
The RNC put together this 12-minute video of Democratic Party election deniers. It is painful in some respects, but a useful reminder of how unprincipled the Democrats have been for a long time, and how hypocritical they are today:
(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...
Texas: Biden total turn out 1,730,493 more votes then Obama (2008) Which amounts to 149% increase in voter turn out. Texas: Biden brought in for total turn out 1,381,258 more votes then Hillary (2016) which amounts to 110% more turn out votes For reference: Texas: Obama (2008) got 349,235 more votes than Hillary (2016)
slight corrections:
Texas: Biden total turn out 1,730,493 more votes then Obama (2008) Which amounts to 149% increase in voter turn out. Texas: Biden brought in for total turn out 1,381,258 more votes then Hillary (2016) which amounts to 136% more turn out votes For reference: Texas: Hillary (2016) got 349,235 more votes than Obama (2008), for 110% more turn out votes.
========================
What you really want to do to get the full effect of what was going on is to print out a county map of the state in question, then plot the Biden increases over Obama 2008 on each county.
You can then see a clear pattern of a central command-and-control county surrounded by counties whose "votes" are being pumped up by the master fraud county.
There may be several of these in larger states.
>When I did Hillary 2016 for Texas in this manner, I could see that they were using border counties as vote pumpers for Hillary.
They abandoned this approach in 2020 in Texas [and in the other states] and went for the gusto - all the larger population counties, and to heck with the smaller counties.
If you find a smaller population county that has an outsized "turnout" - check your map.
You'll see that it's surrounded by large population counties whose "votes" are getting pumped up.
It's just convenient to grab that county while you're doing the others within an hour's drive of the command-and-control county.
I found one of these in Texas [Rockwall County], and one in Georgia [Dawson County], just offhand.
Well exactly - even Trump went to bed around midnight and thought he had won - basically most people thought he had. Like you I’d never seen anything like this.
Thank you for your diligent work on this.
The Republican stronghold [there are actually a few big-city Republican strongholds scattered across the country - Michigan is unusual in having TWO of them] of Kent County [Pete Meijer/Justin Amash] flipped to Biden in 2020, with a big "turnout" for Joe and The Ho.
The neighboring conservative county of Ottawa also "turned out" big for Biden, and a conservative county just south of these two counties showed a big Biden "turnout".
Here's the interesting part:
There's a Democrat stronghold next to these counties - Muskegon city and Muskegon County. Historically, this was a big area for blacks from Chicago to have summer homes a short drive away, and a place to get away from bigotry found in other places [in the old days].
Turned out BIG for Obama in 2008.
Biden 2020? Not so much.
Trump almost won the county. I believe that the difference was that Muskegon wasn't on the rounds of the ballot mules [outside the one-hour driving radius of the central command-and-control county Kent] - and the Michigan Democrats and their Assistant Democrat pals the Republicans had the Trump problem covered elsewhere.
P Obama Biden
O minus div
2008 Obama McCain 2008 total 2020 Biden Trump 2020 total P Biden Obama
Kent 49% 149,909 49% 148,336 303,235 Kent 52% 187,915 46% 165,741 362,031 4 -38,006 125%
Ottawa 37% 50,828 61% 83,330 136,268 Ottawa 38% 64,705 60% 100,913 168,713 7 -13,877 127%
Allegan 44% 24,165 54% 30,061 55,279 Allegan 36% 24,449 62% 41,392 67,195 18 -284 101%
Muskegon 64% 53,821 35% 29,145 84,271 Muskegon 49% 45,643 49% 45,133 92,444 12 8,178 85% You'll notice that Muskegon violates the "population" rule - pump up the vote in the more populated counties.They were working on Kent, and had to choose between Ottawa and Muskegon counties.
Ottawa is more populous by far, and I think they might have scooped up Allegan on the way back. Allegan was probably good for 2,000-2,500 "votes"
Classic data processing decision.
Will look at it later. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.