Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Happy 40th Birthday to Wrath of Khan, The Film That Saved Star Trek
Gizmodo ^ | June 4, 2022 | Justin Carter

Posted on 06/11/2022 7:35:03 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

Star Trek is no stranger to cinema, and the franchise’s quality of films tends to fluctuate with each new release. We’ve seen plenty of pretty good films from the series, and we’ve also seen films that weren’t as good as they could’ve been. Everyone’s got their own favorites, but if there’s one thing that can be agreed upon, it’s that Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan stands above the rest.

Released exactly today in 1982, Khan served as a sequel to both the original 1979 Star Trek film, and the 1967 episode, “Space Seed.” Directed by Nicholas Meyer, who also did uncredited work on its final script with Jack B. Sowards, the film has cast a long shadow over Star Trek. Whether it was due to the shocking death of Spock (Leonard Nimoy), its substantially improved acting, or having a great villain in the form of the late Ricardo Montalban as Khan Noonien Singh, Khan the film was nothing short of a success back in the day. At the time of its release, it came out to strong reviews and was a box office hit, earning $97 million worldwide. Even beyond financials, it spawned a brief sub-franchise for the film franchise, kicking off a trilogy that included 1984's Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, and 1986's Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. And it’s why, at least prior to the 2009 reboot, the Trek fandom held to the belief that even-numbered entries would be the only good films in the series.

(Excerpt) Read more at gizmodo.com ...


TOPICS: Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: movies; ricardomontalbhan; startrek; williamshatner; wrathofkhan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: WoofDog123

Saw an interview with him and he said a lot of directors get lazy when dealing with experienced actors, so when Nicholas Meyer started talking to Ricardo about what he wanted from him, RM said “Oh. You’re going to direct me?”. Went on to explain how much he appreciated that.


61 posted on 06/12/2022 3:07:20 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I just saw the original Khan episode the other night.

Wow. The last line of the episode was just brilliant!!! Something to the effect of ‘wouldn’t you like to go forward 100 years and see what happens to them’ after Khan and his crew were sent to another planet.


62 posted on 06/12/2022 3:37:07 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

why are there no muslims in the original star trek?

because it happens in the FUTURE.


63 posted on 06/12/2022 4:40:11 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Yes. The relevance of “Moby Dick” to Khan’s madness was made much more clear in the novelization.


64 posted on 06/12/2022 5:07:15 AM PDT by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy...and call it progress" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: joma89

And he got a commendation for it too!

(No doubt to cover up Starfleet’s embarassment....)


65 posted on 06/12/2022 5:13:55 AM PDT by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy...and call it progress" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo

No.


66 posted on 06/12/2022 5:26:15 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Well, darn.


67 posted on 06/12/2022 5:53:41 AM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

we saw the same interview!


68 posted on 06/12/2022 6:52:44 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

. . .and it was Stacey Abrams’ first cameo. She played “Gracie”, the whale on the right. . .


69 posted on 06/12/2022 6:58:42 AM PDT by Salgak (You're in Strange Hands with Tom Stranger. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo

It was addressed in an episode of Star Trek: Enterprise called ‘Regeneration’.


70 posted on 06/12/2022 7:01:35 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Salgak

“. . .and it was Stacey Abrams’ first cameo. She played “Gracie”, the whale on the right. . .”

well played!


71 posted on 06/12/2022 7:04:17 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
Really? 70-odd comments and this hasn't been posted yet?


72 posted on 06/12/2022 7:09:15 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack

Trekkies explain that discrepancy by saying that Chekov was onboard the Enterprise at the time,but was not a bridge officer


73 posted on 06/12/2022 7:21:49 AM PDT by Paddyboy (Roma Omnia Vincit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Ah, I haven’t seen Enterprise, I’ll look it up. Wasn’t Enterprise set before TOS? I thought Q introduced the borg.


74 posted on 06/12/2022 2:26:03 PM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson