[G Larry]

It is much less “compliance” than it it overwhelming with useless unformatted data.

[wbarmy]

I tend to agree that this is useless unformatted data. Who knows, maybe they will hardcopy everything and show up at his house with a couple of hundred FEDEX trucks.


FEDEX delivers

[dayglored]

> It is much less “compliance” than it it overwhelming with useless unformatted data.

Exactly. They are playing games in an effort to avoid real compliance.

[bigbob]

Insufficient.

As part of normal due diligence, I would want to see a database of metadata for the past five years and access to enough archived data to be able to validate it. For example, if I were buying a manufacturing business that claimed to have 1000 regular customers I’d want to see the invoices for several years back, to prove there were at least 1000 customers who ordered on a regular basis, not just say, once a year. The point is to make sure the seller is accurately representing the company, so being shown daily orders would be of no value.