p
Hung jury, if not outright acquittal is my prediction. Too many Clinton donors on the jury pool that the Obama judge let on while denying admitted Trump supporters, let alone donors, to even get to voir dire.
.
That is the extent the Beltway bureaucrats have destroyed our public trust in government.
If the FBI, DOJ et.al. were just doing their due diligence by investigating an allegation why did so many upper echelon staffers (Page, Stzrock etc.) fired/resigned? Will they be getting their jobs back once this whitewash is complete?
How much of this testimony will be understood by the jury? Were jurors required to show knowledge of computer technology and terminology?
Day 1 of the Stool Pigeon Who Saved Hillary Clinton, James Comey, McCabe and Clapper.
Way to go! You throw the book at that one low level scapegoat. Justice has been served!
A rat judge and a rat jury will never convict.
This is part of the biggest story of the 21st century. A concerted, coordinated effort to interfere with the lawful election of a United States President.
You would think that this trial would be covered in depth by the media. However, the media was in on the con. Conveniently, the press will talk about Johnny and Amber. And America will be distracted.
The Boston Globe head: Clinton campaign lawyer sought to ‘use’ FBI, prosecutor says
From the NYT article In her opening statement, Ms. Shaw told the jury that Mr. Sussman had represented the Democratic National Committee when it was hacked in the spring of 2016, but she omitted the fact that Russia was the perpetrator.
Mr. Bosworth, by contrast, emphasized to the jury that the onset the events took place “at a time when questions were swirling about Donald Trump’s connections to Russia.”
The hacking of the DNC was no crime, regardless of who did it and Trump had no ties to Russia. Just sayin.