Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: katie didit

My understanding of this, is that it is a small fine for misstating what funds were used for: that is, for ‘consultants’ instead of ‘opposition research.’ What it does do is highlight that Clinton was hiding her role in the ‘dirty dossier’ or otherwise why lie about those expenditures?


6 posted on 03/30/2022 7:17:56 PM PDT by shadowlands1960 ("...some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again... " CSL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: shadowlands1960

Durham...elias and sullivan..

marc is the lawyer and sullivan the campaign advisor.

durham already has sussman and my bet is he is squealing. well, maybe not, since snitches get stitches, or worse.

Sorry I wasnt clear. If I were either one of those guys I would be worried.


9 posted on 03/30/2022 7:59:49 PM PDT by katie didit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: shadowlands1960

Clinton campaign- $8000
DNC. $105,000
Peanuts


11 posted on 03/31/2022 2:56:08 AM PDT by griswold3 (When chaos serves the State, the State will encourage chaos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson