Posted on 12/17/2021 11:40:56 PM PST by ProfessorGoldiloxx
"A U.S. federal judge ruled in favor of the relatives of former national security adviser Michael Flynn Thursday, allowing them to move forward with a lawsuit against CNN.
The relatives, Flynn's brother and sister-in-law, allege that CNN wrongly portrayed them as QAnon conspiracy followers, according to a report.
While U.S. District Court Judge Gregory Woods mostly upheld a magistrate judge's recommendation to throw out the pair's defamation case, he allowed the Flynns to proceed with accusations that CNN portrayed them in a "false light." ..."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Nick Sandmann took a chunk of them. Kyle Rittenhouse is on the way. Go get some General Flynn! And it’s still AT&T CNN, as they’ve owned it for over 5 years now and their attempted sale has hit a regulatory snag.
bookmark
Juicy. And correct.
Better hurry they’re getting cleaned out and accuse a lot of people of being Qtards 🤪
If they can be held accountable for civil action, then why not make it criminal, also? Maybe a little time in the can would make a reasonable discernment for the people that do this type of criminal assassination. As long as their sponsors foot the bill, they are a silent partner. Turn on the spotlight. The first amendment can go both ways.
wy69
Q-Anon was never anything but a meaningless fringe element. Washington leftists and their media accomplices built it into a straw man enemy of the people. It’s not a right-wing element. It’s a left-wing construct.
Indeed hope Kyle Rittenhouse gets his 248 million too then tap the other fake news channels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.