VIDEO: Journalist Reads Filthy Porn Book from School’s Library at FL School Board Meeting – Board Members Call Police to Have Him Forcefully Removed for Reading Obscene Content Aloud

Gateway Pundit ^ | October 27, 2021 | Jacob Engels

[grundle]

After reading aloud a portion of just one section, which included the characters in Gender Queer discussing the use of strap-on dildos and performing oral sex on one another, OCPS Chairman Teresa Jacobs demanded this journalist cease reading the passage. After refusing to do so, she instructed OCPS police officers to eject this journalist from the meeting by force.

[NEMDF]

Of course I did not go and read the article but wondering whether there is some back story of him or other parents having presented to the school board that there is a problem with pornography being available to the students in the library (or, was this the first time it was brought up?).

[The_Media_never_lie]

Pornography should never be available in the classroom. The school board obviously thinks it not appropriate in board meetings. Why should it matter if it has been brought to the attention of the board, or not?

[Lurker]

Teresa Jacobs has an address.

I’m just saying.

L

[humblegunner]

use of strap-on dildos and performing oral sex on one another

Amazing that this is from the Gateway Pundit.

Do y'all know what Jim Hoft does with his Filippino wife Pepe?

[DoughtyOne]

It’s sounding more and more like the staff at our public
schools need to be tared and feathered, and ridden out of
town on a rail.

This is despicable.

[dragnet2]

When do these public schools ban cell phones from these meetings with parents?This crap is so out of control.

And I can’t help but note it’s always their hired guns, better known as cops, who are protecting these arrogant moral misfits, not to mention literally enforcing the leftist ban on free speech, all while wearing a GD gun!

[Lurker]

Is Mr. Hoft’s report accurate?

L

[Lurker]

“not to mention literally enforcing the leftist ban on free speech, all while wearing a GD gun!”

18USC242. Deprivation of Civil Rights Under False Color of Authority.

There’s a related Statute that allows for Civil actions to recover treble damages. People should start using them.

L

[humblegunner]

Is Mr. Hoft’s report accurate?

MISTER Hoft, huh?

MISTER Hoft and his wife Pepe.

THIS you support?

[nesnah]

Ahhh, unclehumper chimes in.

[Osage Orange]

They should have stuffed the MF'er's head down a toilet and flushed it......

Sorry but I don't take rude people much anymore...No sense in it.

[Lurker]

I support honest reporting of facts no matter who is doing it.

And you seem to have an inordinate interest in his sex life. Jealous?

L

[humblegunner]

I’m kind of getting the vibe that you like Hoft and his wife Pepe
and would rather not see them exposed for what they actually are.

In fact... are YOU Pepe and just defending your husband?

You GO, Pepe.

[humblegunner]

And you seem to have an inordinate interest in his sex life.

How about I don't support fags.

[Lurker]

“How about I don’t support fags.”

And yet you comment on almost every thread he’s on. Seems like you’re quite interested in his sex life to me. A normal person would simply avoid them.

But you don’t. Why is that?

L

[eyeamok]

Whoever authorized this trash in the school library should be Arrested and Prosecuted for Distributing Porn to Minors

[Political Junkie Too]

Parents exercised their first amendment right to free speech, peaceable assembly, and protesting the government for a redress of grievances.

To the school board, this is domestic terrorism.

The Supreme Court ruled in New York Times v Sullivan (1964)

23.

The general proposition that freedom of expression upon public questions is secured by the First Amendment has long been settled by our decisions. The constitutional safeguard, we have said,

'was fashioned to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people...

The maintenance of the opportunity for free political discussion to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people and that changes may be obtained by lawful means, an opportunity essential to the security of the Republic, is a fundamental principle of our constitutional system...

(I)t is a prized American privilege to speak one's mind, although not always with perfect good taste, on all public institutions...'

and this opportunity is to be afforded for 'vigorous advocacy' no less than 'abstract discussion.'

The First Amendment, said Judge Learned Hand, 'presupposes that right conclusions are more likely to be gathered out of a multitude of tongues, than through any kind of authoritative selection.

To many this is, and always will be, folly; but we have staked upon it our all.' Mr. Justice Brandeis, in his concurring opinion in Whitney v. California, gave the principle its classic formulation:

24.

'Those who won our independence believed...

that public discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a fundamental principle of the American government. They recognized the risks to which all human institutions are subject.

But they knew that order cannot be secured merely through fear of punishment for its infraction; that it is hazardous to discourage thought, hope and imagination;

that fear breeds repression; that repression breeds hate; that hate menaces stable government;

that the path of safety lies in the opportunity to discuss freely supposed grievances and proposed remedies; and that the fitting remedy for evil counsels is good ones.

Believing in the power of reason as applied through public discussion, they eschewed silence coerced by law—the argument of force in its worst form. Recognizing the occasional tyrannies of governing majorities, they amended the Constitution so that free speech and assembly should be guaranteed.'

25.
Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.

It's a shame how the institutions of public discourse have turned away from holding government accountable and towards silencing the critics of government. Local school boards are the entry level of government, and these people don't like being challenged once they've obtained their positions of power, even on its lowest rung.

-PJ

[humblegunner]

A normal person would simply avoid them.

So you run and hide from democrats and bad government?
Never speak out about them, do you? Just avoid?

Seems like you’re quite interested in his sex life to me.

The fact that he's a fag is relevant to his credibility.

Why is that?

Because he's a fag. Why are you defending fags?

Have you had positive experiences with fags in the past?

Maybe this morning?

[dfwgator]

"With a melon?"