To: marcusmaximus
I think there is more to the story then is being told. First was he out shooting as part of a scene, or was he acting up. And as this going to head live ammunition in it, how could it even be considered a prop? He should be charged with manslaughter until proven otherwise.
45 posted on
10/22/2021 7:58:56 AM PDT by
Reno89519
(FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
To: Reno89519
52 posted on
10/22/2021 8:03:33 AM PDT by
Delta 21
(Quarantine the sick. Protect the vulnerable. Hang the guilty. Free everyone else.)
To: Reno89519
If he was “joking around” and pointed the gun at them and fired, manslaughter is an appropriate charge. If the gun was loaded with an actual bullet, everyone responsible for checking the gun should be also be charged.
How does a dummy round go through a person and then seriously wound another?
54 posted on
10/22/2021 8:04:09 AM PDT by
Deo volente
("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
To: Reno89519
He should be charged with manslaughter until proven otherwise.
Charging somebody "until proven otherwise" seems completely opposite of "innocent until proven guilty". Even for folks we don't like.
To: Reno89519
If he intended to do it, why was he in shock and crying right after?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
