Let’s define good policies.
Build the wall, drain the swamp, America first in all things, pro life and pro guns.
Cheney doesn’t sign on to that. So she must be removed.
You select the candidate most likely to remove her. Are there going to be 5 guys who embrace those policies above, and he just happens to be one of them?
Yes. Probably. So why select him, with a history Cheney could use? Why not policy equivalence and a superior personal history?
I certainly don’t have my heart set on this guy. I’m not familiar with the situation in WY.
What I’m saying is that if there are 5 people trying to replace Cheney and, of the 5, this guy is the ONLY one with the policies that you listed, then I would support this guy over the others.
But if there is some other guy with these policies who seems to have “less history” then I would support that other guy.