Indictments for what?? Double dipping?
Nope...orange hair.
It’s time to try these prosecutors for malicious prosecution and get them disbarred. In America we are not allowed to attack individuals by serially trumping up fake crimes, not even small real offenses as was done with Manafort & others who they thought to use to pressure POTUS Trump.
As laid out more elegantly in the excerpt below:
https://www.oxfordeagle.com/2018/05/09/show-me-the-man-and-ill-show-you-the-crime/
“Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent.”
“Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” was Beria’s infamous boast. He served as deputy premier from 1941 until Stalin’s death in 1953, supervising the expansion of the gulags and other secret detention facilities for political prisoners. He became part of a post-Stalin, short-lived ruling troika until he was executed for treason after Nikita Khrushchev’s coup d’etat in 1953.”
Beria targeted “the man” first, then proceeded to find or fabricate a crime. Beria’s modus operandi was to presume the man guilty, and fill in the blanks later. By contrast, under the United States Constitution, there’s a presumption of innocence that emanates from the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments, as set forth in Coffin vs. U.S. (1895).
Unlike Beria’s paradigm, U.S. prosecutions start with the discovery of a crime. Then there’s an investigation to find or confirm the identity of the perpetrator and collect evidence to prove his or her guilt.
“However, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s appointment and subsequent investigation into alleged collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign appear to follow the Beria model, not the U.S. Constitution model.”
To ‘get Trump’ by any means necessary.
To scratch the itch of hate and for his daring to rock the boat.
“The State alleges that defendant, Donald J. Trump, did knowingly, with malice aforethought, indulge in the unlawful consumption of two scoops of a confection commonly known as ‘iced cream’, in the presence of women and minorities, who were irrevocably traumatized by the experience...”