Unfortunately a lot of them do and it isn't from "outside FR" - and you ping them to threads. Some of their comments are not even consistent from thread to thread.
And you went off on a tirade against someone on another thread who posted straight up, irrefutable factual data attacking him as a propagandist. If the facts don't fit your narrative, you just seem to ignore them and attack the messenger. Narrative above all - facts are irrelevant. This has traditionally been more characteristic of the Left, but it seems as of late some on the right want to see if they can out do them.
Almost all of your accusations against me, are far more applicable to the pro-jab crowd.
Give the exact link to the post where I went off on someone, this ought to be good. I can think of a case where a pro-jabber was trying to assure us of the tremendous background testing of the jabs, quoting a study done on a total of 24 monkeys. That is not a large enough count for meaningful statistics. There's a reason I make fun of the "Because SCIENCE!™" bullcrap. The Nobel-prize-winner who invented the PCR technique, said it was not meant for diagnosis.
I posted a link last night that the CDC changed their guidelines for use of the technique, in a way that increased cases early on, but would decrease them now that the narrative "Vaccinations *work*!™" requires it.
And my source for the supposition that this virus was bio-engineered includes Dr. Luc Montaigner, a Nobel-prize-winning virologist; he is joined today by the former head of Great Britain's MI6 Intelligence Agency.
You were saying?