HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report – 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES

Gateway Pundit ^ | April 9, 2021 | Jim Hoft

[grundle]

Michigan Constitutional Attorney Matthew Deperno released his much anticipated Michigan Elections Forensics Report on Friday.

Among the findings:

* Modem Chipsets Installed In Voting System Motherboards

• 66,194 unregistered ballots tallied in just 9 counties.

66,194 ballot voter IDs not found in October registration database.

Much more to come…

Here’s the link to Matthew DePerno’s findings.

[Reily]

You claimed Congress could decertify the 2020 election. I asked where is that power in the Constitution. You didn’t answer that question ! Then you went into this Constitutional Crisis rant and accused me of supporting Biden. If we are in a state as you say “beyond the Constitution” then it wouldn’t matter what Congress did since they no longer have any legitimate authority. Who would pay any attention to them?

[ifinnegan]

I suggest you read the 12th Amendment.

You do not even know who certifies the electoral votes. It’s not Congress as you mistakenly asserted. You asked a nonsense question based on ignorance.

Now please answer. Do you defend the legitimacy of the Biden presidency, yes or no?

[ifinnegan]

Just to follow up a bit, Reily.

“Then you went into this Constitutional Crisis rant...”

Yes, but I don’t think it’s a rant.

“..and accused me of supporting Biden.”

No, that’s not true. I said nothing about you supporting Biden or his policies etc...

I asked about supporting his legitimacy as president.

Yes or no. Is he legitimate? Is his presidency legitimate? I say no. What say you?

“If we are in a state as you say “beyond the Constitution” then it wouldn’t matter what Congress did since they no longer have any legitimate authority. Who would pay any attention to them?”

Now you are getting it.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

I don't like same day registration either, and drop boxes, etc., are even worse. They all make it easier to commit fraud.

However, when the author ignores the existence of same day registration, and argues that November turnout in excess of October registration numbers proves actual fraud, it's just a terrible argument.

[Dr. Franklin]

I don't like same day registration either, and drop boxes, etc., are even worse. They all make it easier to commit fraud.
However, when the author ignores the existence of same day just registration, and argues that November turnout in excess of October registration numbers proves actual fraud, it's just a terrible argument.

I think you missed the argument from the lawyer, which is a pattern of statistical fraud, not same day registration. Those statistics show that voter registration is near, or even exceeds the population in each county. Then the Election day voters fit the polynomial function "key" which is the same in each county. It's a more sophisticated form of election fraud than the alphabetical voting, like LBJ used in places to win a tough primary election, harder to detect, but once found clear and convincing proof of a rigged election.

You needed to actually follow the links and read the brief to understand that argument because GP didn't develop the story completely. They just like the splashy headline, but don't explain the argument properly.

[usconservative]

Cancel this election.

Exactly. At what point do millions of us saddle up, head to D.C. and do what needs to be done to right the wrong that was done to this country?

The Presidency of the United States of America was STOLEN from We The People!

[GOPJ]

You’re right. It should have been included.

[Dr. Franklin]

However, when the author ignores the existence of same day registration, and argues that November turnout in excess of October registration numbers proves actual fraud, it's just a terrible argument.

Upon review, you assume that ballots resulted from same day registration. There should be a registration form on Election Day, right? Otherwise, these are just illegal or fraudulent ballots. When they do the statistical analysis of such voters, frequently unique surnames are found, and common names like "Johnson" or "Smith" are statistically underrepresented.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Upon review, you assume that ballots resulted from same day registration

I'm making no assumption at all. It is the author who completely ignored the issue of same day registration, thereby assuming that not a single person same day regustered and voted, which is legal under Michigan law.

I have no idea how many people same day registered and voted. I am just saying that you can't ignore the possibility, which is what the author did.