He did it around the most forbidden topic in America: the trans issue. Cancel City, USA. If the debate over Dr. Seuss was the Battle of Salerno, tackling transgender ideological orthodoxy is the invasion of Normandy.
Tucker Carlson laid down the law. Conservatives must not cower in the face of “very difficult decisions.” They must meet them head-on.
Probably part of the Fox strategy to get some viewers back.
I just watched a replay a few minutes ago.
Tucker sliced and diced Asa Hutcherson.
Tucker doesn’t play the part, he’s the real deal. If so, he could emerge as the top populist conservative media celebrity commentator in the country, or world.
It seems Hutchinson is trying to claim that the bill hurts parents control of their children’s health care, and sanctity of patient-doctor relationship and inserts government into this role
Does he have any leg to stand on here with the wording of this bill?
IIRC, Edible Arrangements supports Muslim terrorists, so of course Tucker would be offended by his little offering. Just sayin’
Sarah’s chances are looking good.
Hear!!! Hear!!!!
I predict that 10-20 years from now the majority of these children will sue their parents - and win. As long as it doesn’t come out of my pocket...good.
He reminded me of Jeff Sessions, he sounded like a complete idiot intellectually.
Was Hutchinson responding to pressure from Walmart? Something must have motivated him to adopt his ridiculous position. I don’t think it was conservatism. Maybe he was looking for a job after he leaves office
bookmark
While it remains unclear whether the Walton family personally lobbied Hutchinson on the bill -- neither Hutchinson’s office nor the WFF returned requests for comment -- the two have ties. Per FEC records, the Waltons are longtime financial supporters of Hutchinson’s political career, as is Walmart. Sam Walton’s brother, Steuart Walton, is a current board member at Walmart and was tapped by Hutchinson last April to chair the state’s "Economic Recovery Task Force.”How did Hutchinson know there was corporate worry about the image of Arkansas about these bills if no one from any corporate interests contacted him about them?
The idea that Tom Walton has such passionate feelings about the sexual autonomy of children, and yet wouldn't call up his family's pet governor to make these Frenchian passions known, is too absurd to credit as possible.
He's lying. He told corporate interests that he would triangulate on these bills by signing two of them but vetoing the third.
He did the same thing before with Kristi Noem.