Posted on 03/28/2021 11:48:27 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
“Snead has been accused of using his position as a Little League official to force a political agenda that disrupts the wholesome essence of family and community upon players.”
...that’s the whole point! Nothing is to be wholesome or family orientated. Perversion is the goal. It’s silly to make such an accusation. It’s obvious.
Shame on Biden putting a trans gender in such a place. The Radical left doesn’t care who they hurt...they are fooling themselves as they can’t change their DNA. What they are or want to be is or should be private.
Arpaio’s decision had absolutely nothing to do with the Sh’t program of diversity!
Oh I agree. I guess my point was, don’t treat 5 year old kids like convicts.
Anything organized on a large scale will carry an SJW tax.
Anywhere there’s an economy of scale, there will be an SJW tax to suck away that economic advantage.
this is how country clubs and town clubs got their start.
Next year you might rent a hotel ballroom or a church
isnt it bidet’s state?
This byy is a kook! Little children are being indoctrinated by a goofball who is just stupid. Little children do not understand even what diversity is!
...and a coward.
I agree. If you get 2 teams, they can play each other as the learn. Someone with big backyard could host a 5 year old T-ball team safely.
People *really* need to fall back to the “Or Else What” argument. Parents should intentionally ignore the decision and MAKE Snead enforce it. These bureaucrat expect people to fall in line.
This isn’t the military; when some authority tells you to jump... you can tell him “no”.
Exactly.
It would be better for the faggots, gendertwits and pedos to each hang a millstone from their necks and drown themselves than for them to continue doing what they are doing.
pull your kids, start your own games, you know pick up games with the dads are a hell of a lot more fun than tball ever was. and Little league too.
That was to ensure they didn’t steal the underwear.
This is at some level is likely meant to encourage some kids to be unsure about what underwear to wear. Or work towards that.
What these Left wing twits don’t seem to know history:
Ladies’ Home Journal article in June 1918 said, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.
Still don’t get it?
I guess not. Explain it to me.
Probably mostly because they don't want to "rock the boat" and they think they're setting a good example being "compassionate" to the LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ crowd.
Me? I'd have punched that little league president right in his stupid mouth and kept going until my fist came out his a-hole and then dropped his teeth on the ground. Right in front of everyone.
Every single last one g-d damn' Republican who voted for this FREAK needs to be turned out of office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.