[House Atreides]

Your HYPERACTIVE ANTI-VAX JIHAD continues. So the vaccine trials used FAKE test results? So how did they know when to use false positive test results and show 95% difference between the trial participants who RECEIVED THE VACCINE VERSUS THOSE WHO RECEIVED THE PLACEBO?

By the way, may I assume you’re paid by the word and not by the scientific correctness of your jihad?

[bagster]

By the way, may I assume you’re paid by the word and not by the scientific correctness of your jihad?

You may not, Harkonnen.

Go get your vax and leave real people alone.

And don't forget to mask up, its a scary world out there right about now.

[Jan_Sobieski]

A better name to call us is “no kool-aid drinkers”. We refuse to be gaslighted by false statistics and fear mongering. We refuse to be herded into an experimental vaccine. We refuse to be browbeat by any virtue signaling people like yourself who are willingly ignorant of the global scam that is being perpetrated against free citizens.

Your faith in Government and Big Pharma is admirable, but our faith is in God Given logic, fact, and skepticism. Not in Fauci or Gates.

If you think you are smarter than us, I and many others would gladly challenge anyone here to an IQ test.

[ransomnote]

So the vaccine trials used FAKE test results? So how did they know when to use false positive test results and show 95% difference between the trial participants who RECEIVED THE VACCINE VERSUS THOSE WHO RECEIVED THE PLACEBO?

~~~~~

I think you are intentionally pretending you don't get it. The results didn't show a 95% difference; that's the 'fake' part. They decided what percentage they needed and back calculated to know how many positives they needed. Supposedly, they did it repeatedly for 28 thousand people using an inaccurate test with results which are almost random - an impossibility unless they faked the data.