Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: House Atreides
So the vaccine trials used FAKE test results? So how did they know when to use false positive test results and show 95% difference between the trial participants who RECEIVED THE VACCINE VERSUS THOSE WHO RECEIVED THE PLACEBO?

~~~~~

I think you are intentionally pretending you don't get it. The results didn't show a 95% difference; that's the 'fake' part. They decided what percentage they needed and back calculated to know how many positives they needed. Supposedly, they did it repeatedly for 28 thousand people using an inaccurate test with results which are almost random - an impossibility unless they faked the data.

102 posted on 03/24/2021 5:26:32 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

“I think you are intentionally pretending you don’t get it. The results didn’t show a 95% difference; that’s the ‘fake’ part. They decided what percentage they needed and back calculated to know how many positives they needed. Supposedly, they did it repeatedly for 28 thousand people using an inaccurate test with results which are almost random - an impossibility unless they faked the data.”
***********************************************************
The meaning of your above words are almost incomprehensible to me.

Do you understand that the LAB virus testing was done when a trial participant reported feeling SYMPTOMATIC? Feeling symptoms did not mean they had COVID-19. They could have had a cold or other infection. The lab testing was to determine whether they had the COVID-19 virus or not.

Do you understand that ALL the trial participants DID NOT KNOW WHETHER THEY HAD RECEIVED A PLACEBO OR AN ACTUAL VACCINE? Neither did ALL the people giving the shots know who got what shot. That’s what “double blind” means.

Do you understand that the clinical trial workers (to whom the trial participants reported that they felt symptoms) DID NOT KNOW WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL TRIAL PARTICIPANT REPORTING SYMPTOMS WAS IN THE PLACEBO GROUP OR IN THE ACTUAL VACCINE GROUP. These workers were also “BLIND”. Every time a trial participant reported symptoms, a nasal swab sample was taken to be sent to the lab.

The LAB processing the nasal swabs DID NOT KNOW WHICH GROUP (PLACEBO OR VACCINE). The LAB and its workers were also “BLIND”.

The whole purpose of this BLINDING was to eliminate the possibility of INTENTIONAL OR UNINTENTIONAL BIAS OR CHEATING.


111 posted on 03/24/2021 6:14:48 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson