“I think you are intentionally pretending you don’t get it. The results didn’t show a 95% difference; that’s the ‘fake’ part. They decided what percentage they needed and back calculated to know how many positives they needed. Supposedly, they did it repeatedly for 28 thousand people using an inaccurate test with results which are almost random - an impossibility unless they faked the data.”
***********************************************************
The meaning of your above words are almost incomprehensible to me.
Do you understand that the LAB virus testing was done when a trial participant reported feeling SYMPTOMATIC? Feeling symptoms did not mean they had COVID-19. They could have had a cold or other infection. The lab testing was to determine whether they had the COVID-19 virus or not.
Do you understand that ALL the trial participants DID NOT KNOW WHETHER THEY HAD RECEIVED A PLACEBO OR AN ACTUAL VACCINE? Neither did ALL the people giving the shots know who got what shot. That’s what “double blind” means.
Do you understand that the clinical trial workers (to whom the trial participants reported that they felt symptoms) DID NOT KNOW WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL TRIAL PARTICIPANT REPORTING SYMPTOMS WAS IN THE PLACEBO GROUP OR IN THE ACTUAL VACCINE GROUP. These workers were also “BLIND”. Every time a trial participant reported symptoms, a nasal swab sample was taken to be sent to the lab.
The LAB processing the nasal swabs DID NOT KNOW WHICH GROUP (PLACEBO OR VACCINE). The LAB and its workers were also “BLIND”.
The whole purpose of this BLINDING was to eliminate the possibility of INTENTIONAL OR UNINTENTIONAL BIAS OR CHEATING.
OK
The meaning of your above words are almost incomprehensible to me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
finally something we can agree on!
Do you understand that the LAB virus testing was done when a trial participant reported feeling SYMPTOMATIC? Feeling symptoms did not mean they had COVID-19. They could have had a cold or other infection. The lab testing was to determine whether they had the COVID-19 virus or not.
Do you understand that ALL the trial participants DID NOT KNOW WHETHER THEY HAD RECEIVED A PLACEBO OR AN ACTUAL VACCINE? Neither did ALL the people giving the shots know who got what shot. That’s what “double blind” means.
Do you understand that the clinical trial workers (to whom the trial participants reported that they felt symptoms) DID NOT KNOW WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL TRIAL PARTICIPANT REPORTING SYMPTOMS WAS IN THE PLACEBO GROUP OR IN THE ACTUAL VACCINE GROUP. These workers were also “BLIND”. Every time a trial participant reported symptoms, a nasal swab sample was taken to be sent to the lab.
The LAB processing the nasal swabs DID NOT KNOW WHICH GROUP (PLACEBO OR VACCINE). The LAB and its workers were also “BLIND”.
The whole purpose of this BLINDING was to eliminate the possibility of INTENTIONAL OR UNINTENTIONAL BIAS OR CHEATING.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think you don’t quite grasp what is meant by the word, “cheating”.
I know what “double-blind” means.
I know that the vaccine contains a spike protein unrelated to the Covid-19 virus, but specified for other (common) Corona Virus. There is zero scientific proof that the vaccine protected a single participant from contracting Covid-19.
The adverse reactions to the vaccine indicate runaway auto-immune response (triggered an uncontrolled immune response) and there is fear on the part of industry experts and physicians that the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ can cause both long-term auto-immunity and immune deficiency.
So there isn’t a question of whether the vaccine can raise immunity to some diseases, but there is zero scientific proof that the vaccine worked against Covid-19. This is by design; thee CDC, NIH and vaccine developers purposefully selected and continue to use the PCR.
I can’t post everything I know about the subject every time I respond - this takes time. The vaccine companies are lying about there products elsewhere and have been complicit in the planned-demic and in the case of Pfizer, are working hand-in-glove with the disreputable Fauci.
I demonstrated at the end of the thread post that we have no reason to assume that after killing as many people as possible (withholding safe, effective treatments) and destroying the economy every step of the way, and choosing failed technology long known to pose risks of ADE, they would then produce a vaccine to help us.
So much of the lies and deception regarding the Covid-19 planned-demic and the ‘vaccine’ are publicly in our faces every day that I no longer see the need to point out that all the vaccine companies, along with CDC and NIH etc. KNOWINGLY selected the PCR test given it’s obvious lack of validity and over the objections of the inventor of the PCR.
So I moved ahead of you in my reasoning to discard the ridiculous idea that the trials were the result of their conscientious good will toward us, and instead believe they pocketed most or all of the billions and faked a double-blind trial that ensure them of billions more to come, and the strategic success of their population reduction goals.
They are knowingly lying when they claim no isolated sample of the Covid-19 virus exist, concealing the manufactured nature of the virus (biowarfare) and thwarted the capacity of white hats outside their Deep State network to use such a sample to develop treatments/vaccines that work, let alone understand the virus at all. How much does it take to impact your thinking?
All these are crimes against humanity and treason. Filtering this information into my understanding along with the rest of the world, I do not feel they would hesitate to violate double-blind protocols (they peeked) or fabricate the trial from the ground up.
I don’t know if you’ll understand this because as far as I can tell, you require capital letters to communicate. No, I’m not going to waste my time editing this post - deal with it.