THE ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE MUST INVOKE NUCLEAR OPTION TO CHOOSE ELECTORS, SINCE SUBPOENA WAS IGNORED
And who is going to make them do that, which they have already refused to do? You?
Please, legislators, please do it now!
we can’t allow USA to be taken over by a couple billionaire seditionists and foreign dictatorships (DNC Puppetmeisters)
you KNOW Trump won in AZ.
by a BIG margin!
94 mile Trump supporters traffic jam RALLY in Arizona, compared with NOT A SINGLE VOTER SHOWING UP for Biden’s Arizona rally
what more proof do you need, for Heaven’s sake?
Counting of Electors?
The Arizona State Legislature Must Invoke Nuclear Option To Choose Electors, Since Subpoena Was Ignored
RE: Arizona State Senator at ‘Stop the Steal’ Rally: ‘We’re Not Going to Give Up’
If your a constituent of Arizona State Sen. Sonny Borrelli, or any other in the state for that matter, you might want to inform them they hold all the cards. They have the authority to act and not just talk or rally. Please pass along to anyone else you might know who is a concerned citizen in Arizona.
The scary thing is that we must rely on the honesty and strength of the Republicans in Congress...And I am not too optimistic about that...If on Jan. 7 those with the power determine illegally that Biden has enough votes to win, there’s not anything other than an armed revolution that will keep Trump in power...
p
Just keep moving along folks, don’t you have a NFL game to watch? The US Supremes don’t care, The networks have already called the election, and there is nothing to see here. S/.
The Arizona State Legislature Must Invoke Nuclear Option To Choose Electors, Since Subpoena Was Ignored
The claim that the subpoena was ignored is simply untrue. The subpoena itself is not a Judicial subpoena but a Legislative subpoena, served upon an element of the Executive branch. It is subject to challenge under separation of powers.
The Executive did not ignore the subpoena but challenged its validity in a lawsuit. The lawsuit is Maricopa County et al v. Karen Fann, in her official capacity as President of the Arizona Senate et al, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa. The COMPLAINT is dated December 18, 2020.
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/65534/Complaint
The COMPLAINT at 12 argues:
59. A legislative subpoena is proper only if it, first, is authorized by ordinance or similar enactment, second, serves a valid legislative purpose, and third, the witnesses or material subpoenaed are pertinent to the subject matter of the investigation. Conn. Indem. Co. v. Superior Court, 23 Cal. 4th 807, 813, 3 P.3d 868, 872 (citing Wilkinson v. United States, 365 U.S. 399, 408-409 (1961)).60. The Subpoenas at issue here fail each of these three requirements.