2) The traditional methods require lesser skills and are generally more reliable. Not all places use the newer computer applications with the available gimmicks, so in some cases you have to go back to basics.
But if you want real-time fraudulent totals reported on the the major networks, nothing can beat a good computer application that can adjust the tallies while you watch.
If the gimmicks work properly, you can have this project wrapped up by 10:00PM for the national networks to call your candidates the "winners". Who could possibly argue with that?
Oops. Standby.
If my precinct has 1,000 votes cast ... 600 of them are for Trump and 400 of them are for Biden ... and the computer reports that Biden got 600 and Trump got 400 ... a manual recount will show the real result.
And if the extra 200 Trump ballots get “lost” then the count will be 400-400 ... and the computer rigging is completely pointless because it isn’t needed if the intent is to destroy Trump ballots. That would be done before they were even run through the scanner.
I don’t know why so many Freepers are fixated on this idiocy of making something so much more complicated than it needs to be. For that matter, I don’t know why Powell was, either.