Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN and Twitter Target President Trump and The Gateway Pundit – Won’t Allow Us to Share the Actual COVID-19 Numbers from the CDC Website that Don’t Fit Their Narrative
Gateway Pundit ^ | 08/30/2020 | Joe Hoft

Posted on 08/30/2020 8:08:07 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

CNN and Twitter are at it again. Today CNN slandered President Trump and the Gateway Pundit and encouraged Twitter to take down a tweet based on CDC data that the President retweeted.

CNN and Twitter don’t want Americans to know the full truth about COVID-19.

Last night we posted an article about COVID-19 – SHOCK REPORT: This Week CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers – Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses

The gist of the article is that COVID-19 is not nearly as deadly as first projected by the WHO and then by Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx. Based on CDC numbers this past week only 6% of all deaths attributed to COVID-19 were instances where the only factor in the individual’s death was due to COVI9-19.

From the CDC website.

For all the other deaths reported by the CDC linked to COVID-19, the individuals who passed away had 2-3 other serious illnesses or co-morbidities. This comes from actual data from the CDC and was tweeted by Mel Q on Twitter.

Mel Q shared a calculation which showed that 6% of all COVID-19 deaths as reported by the CDC was only 9,201 deaths.

Only 9,201 people died in the US this year where COVID-19 was their only cause of death.

We used Mel Q’s tweet in our report and the President of the United States retweeted Mel Q’s tweet as well.

But today Twitter took down the tweet. They notified Mel Q that the tweet that used actual CDC data “violated their policy on misleading information about COVID-19.” Her account was suspended from posting for 12 hours.

Next CNN wrote an article about this calculation, the President’s retweet and our article entitled – Twitter removes QAnon supporter’s false claim about coronavirus death statistics that Trump had retweeted

They also tweeted out their work:

Twitter has taken down a tweet containing a false claim about coronavirus death statistics that was made by a supporter of the baseless QAnon conspiracy theory — a post that President Trump retweeted earlier in the day https://t.co/QL65Bjw0Fe

— CNN (@CNN) August 30, 2020

Of course they never approached us about their garbage post. Here is what CNN reported:

Twitter on Sunday took down a tweet containing a false claim about coronavirus death statistics that was made by a supporter of the baseless QAnon conspiracy theory — a post that President Donald Trump had retweeted earlier in the day.

The tweet — which has been replaced with a message saying, “This Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules — from “Mel Q,” copied from someone else’s Facebook post, claimed that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had “quietly” updated its numbers “to admit that only 6%” of people listed as coronavirus deaths “actually died from Covid,” since “the other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses.”
That’s not what the CDC said.

As of Sunday at 4 p.m. ET, Twitter had not removed a second tweet, also retweeted by the President on Sunday, that spread the same false claim. The second tweet, by Trump campaign adviser Jenna Ellis, linked to an article on the right-wing website Gateway Pundit that was based on the QAnon supporter’s tweet.

In CNN’s very first sentence they make a false premise. CNN claims Mel Q’s tweet was false but that is not true – it’s based on actual CDC data from the CDC website.

CNN then makes another false statement claiming the CDC said something other that what the CDC actually reported.

And in their third paragraph CNN claims our post and tweet about the topic is false as well.

Next CNN uses liberal logic and assumptions as the basis for why Mel Q’s tweet and our post are incorrect.

CNN reported:

The CDC’s latest regular update to a public statistics page on the pandemic — there was nothing especially “quiet” about it — said that for 6% of the deaths included in its statistics, “Covid-19 was the only cause mentioned” on the deceased person’s death certificate.

That is not at all the same thing as saying only 6% of reported Covid-19 deaths “actually died” from Covid-19. It simply means that the other 94% were listed as having at least one additional factor contributing to their death.

CNN makes the assumption that we were saying none of the other 94% of deaths classified as COVID-19 deaths were not COVID-19 related deaths. That is not what we said. What we did say is that only 9,201 deaths were related only to COVID-19.

CNN then makes that broad statement that 94% of the deaths listed had at least one additional factor. This is true but the CDC is clear that the average number of other issues (co-morbidities) related to the deaths they counted as COVID-19 deaths is 2.6 – meaning most people who died had closer to three other “conditions or causes” related to their death.

CNN then finishes with this baseless statement:

The CDC told CNN in July that Covid-19 will end up as a Top 10 cause of death for 2020. The final ranking from the CDC will be based on death certificates for the calendar year.

This statement has nothing to do with our article or Mel Q’s tweet and actually supports what we are saying. If the CDC continues count COVID-19 deaths and then add thousands of additional deaths to their numbers which they assume were related to COVID-19, then COVID-19 will be one of the top 10 causes of deaths in the US this year.

To be fair, the CDC has done a horrible job with their reporting related to COVID-19. It would be easy for the CDC to provide data on deaths that could protect identities but provide for a more detailed analysis of results. But it’s likely the CDC doesn’t want us to know the real implications of COVID-19.


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: cdc; cnn; covid19; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2020 8:08:07 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Truth? Libs can’t handle the Truth....


2 posted on 08/30/2020 8:13:37 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

they were way off, one of the reasons for the quarantine and shutting down was that the virus was going to kill millions..after that it was to “flatten the curve” and when the curve was flattened, then it was “testing for all” and who knows what the next moniker will be.


3 posted on 08/30/2020 8:15:37 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

“The Truth? Libs can’t handle the Truth....”


“LIBS”?

Have you seen the threads about those CDC numbers here on FR???


4 posted on 08/30/2020 8:16:01 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
word is getting out

According to The New York Times, potentially 90 percent of those who have tested positive for COVID-19 have such insignificant amounts of the virus present in their bodies that such individuals do not need to isolate nor are they candidates for contact tracing. Leading public health experts are now concerned that overtesting is responsible for misdiagnosing a huge number of people with harmless amounts of the virus in their systems.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/08/29/it-looks-like-a-lot-of-those-positive-covid-tests-should-have-been-negative-n2575305

5 posted on 08/30/2020 8:17:49 PM PDT by SisterK (its a spiritual war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

Bump that.


6 posted on 08/30/2020 8:20:24 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

flatten the fear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=wHdnp54_lco


7 posted on 08/30/2020 8:23:53 PM PDT by SisterK (its a spiritual war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

“..Have you seen the threads about those CDC numbers here on FR???...”

Yep. And why is the CDC quietly doing it now?
Maybe to ease the pressure and to protect the 4-5 communist RAT governors, like Cuomo, that outright mass murdered the innocent elderly from a scheduled appointment at the gallows. Inquiring minds would really like to know.


8 posted on 08/30/2020 8:28:06 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Based on CDC numbers this past week only 6% of all deaths attributed to COVID-19 were instances where the only factor in the individual’s death was due to COVI9-19.

That can't be true, because it doesn't fit the anti-Trump narrative that he was negligent and it doesn't fit the numbers which democrats prefer with which they've been bashing Trump. It also wouldn't be helpful in getting Biden elected.

Which proves once again that the democrats' worst enemy is the truth.
9 posted on 08/30/2020 8:30:14 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Tucker?


10 posted on 08/30/2020 8:32:00 PM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; know.your.why; zeestephen; norsky; BenLurkin

Ping!


11 posted on 08/30/2020 8:36:21 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here’s the actual CDC page; https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

there nothing about 6% on it anywhere.


12 posted on 08/30/2020 8:43:02 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hey, Kozak! Where are you?!


13 posted on 08/30/2020 8:43:46 PM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Could be wrong but I think that the excess deaths chart tells the actual story.


14 posted on 08/30/2020 8:44:35 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
RE: there nothing about 6% on it anywhere.

SEE THIS PAGE


15 posted on 08/30/2020 8:45:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

CNN is the first one going out.

All your data belong to us.


16 posted on 08/30/2020 8:46:11 PM PDT by eyedigress (Joe, put your mask on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have a question that’s been troubling me that I’m sure some of our FR experts can answer.

Of the 9,201 who died of “COVID alone,” how many were longtime alcoholics or serious drug addicts?

Or is substance abuse classified as a “comorbidity”?

Again, just wondering. In my town, as I’m sure in a lot of other towns, there are people very far gone on meth who really don’t look as if they could withstand a tough virus on top of it.


17 posted on 08/30/2020 8:46:12 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s foolish to act as if the 100% of the 94% with comorbidities died from the comorbidities and not covid. It’s not just foolish, it’s stupid. It makes us look like democrats.


18 posted on 08/30/2020 8:58:04 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

What it does show, though, is that if you don’t have any co-morbitities, your chances of dying are very slim.


19 posted on 08/30/2020 9:43:00 PM PDT by GoDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Well we know at least one of them died from a motorcycle wreck, and I would bet a bunch more died from on immediate cause, since those wouldn’t count as a co-morbidity.


20 posted on 08/30/2020 9:54:20 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson