I respect your opinion and say this in sincerity, with no unfriendliness or disrespect intended.
Every thing you said in this post is wrong, legally.
I completely understand how frustrated and angry people are. I am one of them.
People get the “grinds exceedingly slow” part of the saying, but they do not get the part about grinding “exceedingly fine.”
I am baffled why people freely give legal opinions when they really have no knowledge of the law in substance or procedure. Doesn’t it occur to people that they have no idea what they are talking about, but just throwing around legal terms, not knowing that large bodies of exceedingly fine law attaches to each grand principle?
BTW one of the disgraces in this country is how often courts acknowledge prosecutorial misconduct but fail to punish it. It happens literally every day, every where, all across this country, and it happens because prosecutors have been told BY THE COURTS, in effect, you will suffer no consequences for it.
It is the same as law enforcement lying. Courts simply will never call out law enforcement for lying, so LEOs lie.
I used the word “never” above, and what I really mean is rarely. But so rarely as to almost be never.
I am confused as to why your are baffled. If you want to explore my particular area of expertise, I would have to know how much you understand about airborne software before I could begin to provide meaningful explanations.
I'm afraid I see your style or argument in a non-legal setting as counter productive. You dismiss arguments without explaining why they are incorrect, perhaps assuming that everyone should have the same level of expertise in this arena as you. In doing so, you reinforce the idea that the legal system was designed to support primacy of the legal system and its participants.