I am confused as to why your are baffled. If you want to explore my particular area of expertise, I would have to know how much you understand about airborne software before I could begin to provide meaningful explanations.
I'm afraid I see your style or argument in a non-legal setting as counter productive. You dismiss arguments without explaining why they are incorrect, perhaps assuming that everyone should have the same level of expertise in this arena as you. In doing so, you reinforce the idea that the legal system was designed to support primacy of the legal system and its participants.
That’s right. You went to court once and did a great job. So you convinced yourself you can render definitive legal opinions.
The area we are actually discussing is self-knowledge and humility.