[pepsi_junkie]

What's the punishment for the DOJ prosecutors who witheld evidence and ignored this judge's orders? Is it only Flynn who suffers consequences for changing his legal strategy after DOJ corruption was reveled and they were forced to produce exculpatory evidence? As it stands, yes. DOJ railroads someone thoroughly, prosecutes them maliciously, lies to the court repeatedly, get caught and the ony person in jeopardy is the defendant.

Yeah, this isn't something to get upset about.

[Gratia]

These are two separate issues. It is not a matter of “they committed crimes, so I am justified in committing a crime”

Durham is and always has been the person to bring justice to the Deep State sleaze and slime. Because of what Barr did with Flynn, I now happily expect RICO indictments to come down, including BO as an unindicted co-conspirator. Barr was clearing the incompetent Powell out of the way before she did any more damage.

Powell showed horrible judgment in trying to take over Durham’s job. But (IMO only) she was motivated by sharing in the glory and the loot. She has never made a coherent legal argument. Nor has anyone of her supporters who call her brilliant EVER demonstrated why her legal strategy made sense FOR HER CLIENT.

She blundered her way into doing something she had the initial sense not to do: move to withdraw the plea. Now we are seeing the predictable and necessary consequence of her blunder: Flynn has confessed to committing perjury in court under oath.