Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary-Supporting Civics Teacher to Beto: How Will You Skirt SCOTUS on Mandatory Buybacks?
Townhall ^ | October 9, 2019 | Beth Baumann

Posted on 10/09/2019 1:23:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

In a new NPR series called "Off the Script," 55-year-old social students and civics teacher Ruben Sandoval, who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, asked Beto O'Rourke how he would circumvent the Supreme Court to achieve his mandatory buyback of AR-15s. Specifically, Sandoval referenced two landmark cases that protect the Second Amendment and an American's right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

"As you know, one of the courses that I teach, I teach Texas government and also state and local government bath at Coronado and EPCC [El Paso Community College]. So we kind of discuss these issues as far as the Second Amendment and the limits on the Second Amendment. And I remember what you said on the stage as far as the buyback program, the mandatory buyback. The question I have is: How would you get around the Supreme Court rulings?" Sandoval asked.

"I mean, you've got the D.C. v. Heller, which began to federalize or actually applied it to D.C., the Second Amendment, and then you have the McDonald v. Chicago, which basically said the Second Amendment is incorporated to all States," Sandoval explained. "And so it would seem as though the courts would probably rule against something banning the AK-47, the AR-15s. And a mandatory buyback program would seem to be deemed unconstitutional, and as late as 2016, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals also included assault rifles to be part of the arms that are protected by the Second Amendment. So how would you be able to get around that?"

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: banglist; beto; bobblehead; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Yo-Yo

“Trouble is, SCOTUS has declined to hear appeals of Assault Weapon Bans in Maryland and Illinois, so we don’t really know if the Supreme Court would strike down an AR and AK ban.”

Could be that the the execrable supreme court has decided that the states can set parameters on which battle rifles are permissible in each state.

That would mean that weenie, liberal states have less firepower, while conservative states are heavily armed and can blow leftists out of the water.

Just a thought.


21 posted on 10/09/2019 5:27:40 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The only time leftists use the Constitution is to use it against the people and for their own power.

This truism never fails.


22 posted on 10/09/2019 5:35:31 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Fascism and socialism are cousins. They both disarm their citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

LOL - good one.


23 posted on 10/09/2019 9:07:16 PM PDT by GOPJ (Change the name from "Deep State" to 'Corrupt Mindless Bureaucracies'...."CMB')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson