Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

I can maybe understand the left’s idiotic reasoning for “assault weapon” banning, even though I do not agree with it.

But just what in the hubs of Hell justifies restricting the sale of body armor? This is not an offensive tool, it’s strictly defensive.

I can see new signs up where lefties have gun free zones. There will now be signs that say “Body Armor Free Zones”. We will have to get concealed or open carry body armor permits. We cannot have the ones with pistol grips or magazines that carry more than 10 parts of armor.

What’s next on the list to be banned, home security cameras? Privacy fencing? Safe rooms? Knives? Bow/Arrows? Night vision devices? Why not just cut to the chase and ban the right to privacy and the right to life and just start marching us to the concentration camps with those special ovens that do not bake bread.


35 posted on 08/12/2019 11:07:25 AM PDT by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: redfreedom

‘Zactly - it’s explicitly NOT an offensive tool. In fact, in some cases being shot with body armor on will still pack a hell of a punch. And, certain calibers vs. certain levels of body armor don’t protect the wearer.


47 posted on 08/12/2019 11:31:52 AM PDT by Made In The USA (Next thing you know, 'ol Jed's a millionaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: redfreedom

Cuomo just signed the “ceramic knife” ban in New York.


74 posted on 08/12/2019 3:20:41 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson