Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Major Development, Court Orders Unsealing of Docs Epstein Sex Trafficking Ring
Law and Crime ^ | July 3, 2019 | Matt Naham

Posted on 07/03/2019 12:37:08 PM PDT by COUNTrecount

In Major Development, Court Orders Unsealing of Docs Related to Alleged Epstein Sex Trafficking Ring The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Wednesday ordered the unsealing of the summary judgement record of lawsuit against a woman accused of running a sex trafficking ring with billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The impact of the news has been described as “potentially explosive,” given that the documents could shine sunlight on allegations against Epstein and his former partner and alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, plus unnamed individuals who argued against the unsealing of documents.

Virginia Giuffre (formerly Roberts) claimed that Maxwell recruited her to be a “masseuse” for Epstein when she worked at Mar-a-Lago, the Florida club owned by President Donald Trump. As Courthouse News noted, former President Bill Clinton “hitched multiple rides on Epstein’s jet to his private island,” while President Trump “once called Epstein a ‘friend.'” Giuffre alleged that from 1999 to 2002, she was used to perform sexual acts. She said she was just 16 when this began and claimed that other underage girls were used as well. According to the Miami Herald, Maxwell settled the case in 2017 for millions of dollars.

A John Doe once argued that an unsealing of documents related to to this case could “substantially infringe the privacy and reputational interests of many third persons … who have never been charged with a crime, have never been subject to civil proceedings, and have never been publicly identified by Giuffre.”

The appellate court noted at length on Wednesday the background of this case, including that allegations were made against “several other” unnamed “prominent individuals” — even “world leaders”:

The origins of this case lie in a decade-old criminal proceeding against financier Jeffrey Epstein (“Epstein”). On June 30, 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state charges of soliciting, and procuring a person under the age of eighteen for, prostitution. The charges stemmed from sexual activity with privately hired “masseuses,” some of whom were under eighteen, Florida’s age of consent. Pursuant to an agreement with state and federal prosecutors, Epstein pleaded to the state charges. He received limited jail-time, registered as a sex offender, and agreed to pay compensation to his victims. In return, prosecutors declined to bring federal charges.

Shortly after Epstein entered his plea, two of his victims, proceeding as “Jane Doe 1” and “Jane Doe 2,” filed suit against the Government in the Southern District of Florida under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”). The victims sought to nullify the plea agreement, alleging that the Government failed to fulfill its legal obligations to inform and consult with them in the process leading up to Epstein’s plea deal.

On December 30, 2014, two additional unnamed victims—one of whom has now self-identified as Plaintiff-Appellee Virginia Giuffre (“Giuffre”)—petitioned to join in the CVRA case. These petitioners included in their filings not only descriptions of sexual abuse by Epstein, but also new allegations of sexual abuse by several other prominent individuals, “including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well- known Prime Minister, and other world leaders,” as well as [Alan] Dershowitz (a long-time member of the Harvard Law School faculty who had worked on Epstein’s legal defense) and Defendant-Appellee Ghislaine Maxwell (“Maxwell”).

As noted in the case background excerpt just above, Giuffre previously accused Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz of having sex with her while she was underage and under Epstein’s control. Dershowitz called Giuffre a “certified, complete, total liar” in a conversation with the Law & Crime Network’s Brian Ross in Dec. 2018. He said Giuffre’s allegations against him were a “complete and total fabrication.”

Dershowitz is named as an intervenor-appellant in Second’s Circuit filing, along with Mike Cernovich and the Miami Herald/reporter Julie Brown. Brown has won an award for the “Perversion of Justice” series that investigated the Epstein plea deal that enabled him to avoid federal charges. Dershowitz was among the team of “powerful lawyers” who represented Epstein and helped him secure that deal, along with Kenneth Starr (yes, that Ken Starr).

Epstein was convicted in 2008 as part of a guilty plea to a state charge of soliciting prostitution from underage girls, resulting in 13 months in county jail, home detention, and him registering as a sex offender. The billionaire avoided federal charges by entering into a non-prosecution agreement, which a federal judge recently said was made illegally. The agreement, which was offered by prosecutors working under then-federal prosecutor Alexander Acosta (President Trump’s current U.S. Labor Secretary), was made without informing any of the alleged victims in the case.

Dershowitz moved to intervene in the case at hand, first seeking to unseal documents that he said would prove Giuffre fabricated allegations against him. When Cernovich moved to intervene to unseal the summary judgement record, Dershowitz joined that motion. The Miami Herald eventually moved to unseal the “entire docket,” the appellate court filing said.

Dershowitz told Law&Crime on Wednesday that he was “pleased” with the appellate court’s ruling, promising that “smoking gun” emails would prove that he was “framed” over money.

“I’m pleased that the truth will finally come out when these sealed documents are released. These ‘smoking gun’ emails and unpublished book manuscript will prove that I was deliberately framed for financial reasons and that my false accuser effectively admitted in writing that she never had sex with me,” Dershowitz said.

The appellate court ruled that the district court “failed to conduct the requisite particularized review when ordering the sealing of the materials at issue.” Due to “potential damage to privacy and reputation that may accompany public disclosure of hard-fought, sensitive litigation” the court ordered the unsealing of the summary judgement record and asked the district court to begin “particularized review of the remaining sealed materials” — of which there are many.

The court bullet-pointed its holding for clarity as follows:

(1) Materials submitted in connection with a motion for summary judgment are subject to a strong presumption of public access. (2) The summary judgment record at issue will be unsealed upon issuance of our mandate, subject to minimal redactions. (3) Materials submitted in connection with, and relevant to, discovery motions, motions in limine, and other non-dispositive motions are subject to a lesser—but still substantial— presumption of public access. (4) The District Court is directed to review the remaining sealed materials individually and unseal those materials as appropriate. (5) District courts should exercise the full range of their substantial powers to ensure their files do not become vehicles for defamation.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6181306-Court-Order-Unseal.html
1 posted on 07/03/2019 12:37:08 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Ruh-Roh. The Bent One might be in a twist over this news.


2 posted on 07/03/2019 12:41:51 PM PDT by bobby.223 (Retired up in the snowy Mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a great life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Woah.

Maxwell was Epstein’s recruiter for underage girls.


3 posted on 07/03/2019 12:44:10 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Passenger manifests for Epstein's Lolita Express flights?

I wonder if anybody in the Clinton household is nervous?


4 posted on 07/03/2019 12:50:46 PM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

More likely entire pages blacked out.


5 posted on 07/03/2019 12:56:40 PM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I think some one in Meghan Markle’s new family may be a bit nervous, iirc the stories back then.


6 posted on 07/03/2019 1:09:58 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bobby.223

It’s not going to get any air time. Primarily only conservatives will even be aware of it.

And Democrats don’t give a darn about crimes that took place 10-20 years or more ago.....if committed by Dems. “That’s long in the past - no need to bring it up move on”


7 posted on 07/03/2019 1:11:23 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade
The Maxwells were, probably still are, a really sleazy bunch.

When her father went missing, presumed drowned, I suspected it was a cover for him to live out his remaining years outside of prison.

8 posted on 07/03/2019 1:12:47 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

Also keep this name in mind.

Rachael Chandler.

She was on Epstein’s plane with Clinton.

(She knows everything.)


9 posted on 07/03/2019 1:15:58 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

Especially Prince Andrew.


10 posted on 07/03/2019 1:16:17 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

This guys friends in VERY HIGH PLACES!


11 posted on 07/03/2019 1:23:12 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

I agree with your thoughts overall but this story involves little girls being horribly abused. It just might get a bit more traction in the MSM than the ordinary democ’RAT scandal. We will see I suppose.


12 posted on 07/03/2019 1:47:09 PM PDT by bobby.223 (Retired up in the snowy Mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a great life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
...who have never been charged with a crime, have never been subject to civil proceedings, and have never been publicly identified...

Words of art that mean absolutely nothing.

13 posted on 07/03/2019 1:53:00 PM PDT by frog in a pot (Federal bailouts are often the taxpayers in other states paying for a socialist fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Jeffrey Epstein. Keith Raniere.

Multi-tiered justice system.

Multi. Tiered.


14 posted on 07/03/2019 2:39:39 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade
Rachael Chandler.

Rachael (Ray) Chandler = Allison Mack x100


15 posted on 07/03/2019 2:48:18 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Arkancide coming soon to a neighborhood near you.


16 posted on 07/03/2019 2:58:37 PM PDT by decal (I'm not rude, I don't suffer fools is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


17 posted on 07/03/2019 10:19:44 PM PDT by bitt (US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

https://www.courthousenews.com/court-orders-sunlight-on-huge-tranche-of-jeffrey-epstein-files/


18 posted on 07/03/2019 10:31:55 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Kind of pathetic how they made sure to include Trump’s name in it even though the Clintons are the ones up to their elbows in it...


19 posted on 07/04/2019 2:12:27 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Dershowitz is dirty. He has fooled almost every conservative big wig including Hannity and maybe potus except a few who bothered to dig a little deeper and figure out what was going on.

Dershowitz once described Epstein as one of the smartest men he knew and wouldn't even release a book he was writing until he touched base with Epstein.He made numerous trips on the Miss Lolita and had sex with who knows how many under-aged gals. He has fooled everyone with his conservative contrived BS. But, the truth is there to be found unless it's been blacked out by now.

20 posted on 07/04/2019 6:02:04 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Maga: USA supports Trump. Home of the Free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson