Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

‘A name everyone will recognize’….......Rudy?..........Levin?...............DiGenova?.............Dershowitz?...............
1 posted on 06/06/2019 10:35:05 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Red Badger

The whole having to sell his house in order to pay people who had him plead guilty to a crime he didn’t commit thing probably didn’t wear well over time.


2 posted on 06/06/2019 10:37:23 AM PDT by thoughtomator (The Clinton Coup attempt was a worse attack on the USA than was 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

that kabuki gets him another 6 month or whatever reprieve from sentencing.

maybe the end game is coming?


3 posted on 06/06/2019 10:37:30 AM PDT by SteveH (intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

My guess..DiGenova


5 posted on 06/06/2019 10:41:42 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I tell you, every day, another turn.


6 posted on 06/06/2019 10:43:00 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I hope its Powell.


7 posted on 06/06/2019 10:43:21 AM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Why did Susan Rice send herself an email on Trump's inauguration day---just hours before she was scheduled to leave.

Rice's email purported to document part of the strange meeting Obama held.

Rice was nervous about the fact that, at the president’s direction, she had failed to “share information fully as it relates to Russia” with President Trump’s incoming national security team........

NOTE: Rice was being replaced by Gen Flynn.

Her actions violated longstanding American tradition. Outgoing administrations have always cooperated in the transition to a new administration, whether of the same or the opposing party, especially on matters relating to national security.

Susan Rice is far from the brightest bulb on the tree, but she was well aware that by concealing facts ostensibly relating to national security from her counterpart in the new administration–General Michael Flynn–she was, at a minimum, violating longstanding civic norms.

If she actually lied to Flynn, she could have been accused of much worse. So Rice wanted to be able to retrieve her email, if she found herself in a sticky situation, and tell the world that she hid relevant facts about Russia from the new administration on Barack Obama’s orders.

What were the secrets that Obama wanted to keep from the new Trump administration?
We can easily surmise that
<><>the Steele memo was paid for by the Democratic Party;
<><>that the FBI had to some degree collaborated with Steele;
<><>that the Clinton campaign had fed some of the fake news in the dossier to Steele;
<><>that Comey’s FBI had used Steele’s fabrications as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.

These were among the facts that Obama and his minions didn’t want Michael Flynn and Donald Trump to know. Susan Rice, we can infer, was told to keep these secrets, and if anyone ever asked why she had failed to disclose them to Michael Flynn and others on Trump’s team, or even lied to those people, she would have the defense that President Obama ordered her to do it.

There may be more to it than this. The redacted paragraph likely contains more information about what it was that Rice wasn’t supposed to tell the Trump team. One of these days, we will learn what was blacked out.

The fact that Michael Flynn was Susan Rice’s counterpart in the incoming administration may also be significant. We know that the FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn–even Peter Strzok!–reported that they didn’t think he had lied about anything.

And yet, Obama’s DOJ and Bob Mueller’s “investigation”–basically a continuation of Obama’s corrupt Department of Justice under another, less accountable name–persecuted Flynn to the point where he finally pled guilty to a single count of lying to the FBI in order, as he says, to end the madness and the financial drain.

Why were the Democrats so determined to discredit General Flynn? Perhaps because they wanted to pre-empt any outrage that may otherwise have followed on revelations that the Obama administration’s National Security Advisor hid important facts from Gen Flynn, her successor, during the transition, and may have lied to him about those facts, in violation of all American tradition.

9 posted on 06/06/2019 10:47:34 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

A little slow on the breaking news. The story was first posted 2 hours ago.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3754945/posts

But FOXNEWS will report it five days later. /s


12 posted on 06/06/2019 10:48:54 AM PDT by zaxtres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Never understood why Flynn hired the law firm Covington & Burling in the first place. It is closely tied to the Democratic party. His attorney’s could have had the charges dismissed within a month or two. Instead, they worked against his interests and milked him for everything he owned.

I suspect Flynn’s new attorney will have this case dismissed in short order and then sue the previous attorneys for the fees they charged. They should also be disbarred.


13 posted on 06/06/2019 10:49:45 AM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Avenatti?

Only kidding.


14 posted on 06/06/2019 10:49:46 AM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“DiGenova?.............Dershowitz?............... “

Good guesses. Wouldn’t Geoffrey Feiger be a hoot?


15 posted on 06/06/2019 10:51:37 AM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Better very late in the game than not at all, I suppose.
All that money he’s spent may never be recovered, but when one’s freedom is at stake, you get desperate.
No one wants to end up like Manafort, now packing his one bag for Riker’s Island.


16 posted on 06/06/2019 10:51:43 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

My guess is DiGenova or his wife?????


18 posted on 06/06/2019 10:52:57 AM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Avanatti?


19 posted on 06/06/2019 10:57:40 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Covington & Burling is Eric Holder's firm.
I wonder if Flynn's lawyers were sand bagging their client??
22 posted on 06/06/2019 11:01:26 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


23 posted on 06/06/2019 11:01:29 AM PDT by bitt (I donate all my chips to erecting electric bleachers in Gitmo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Never understood why Flynn hired the law firm Covington & Burling in the first place. It is closely tied to the Democratic party. His attorney’s could have had the charges dismissed within a month or two. Instead, they worked against his interests and milked him for everything he owned.

I suspect Flynn’s new attorney will have this case dismissed in short order and then sue the previous attorneys for the fees they charged.


27 posted on 06/06/2019 11:06:33 AM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Remember when we used to call him Drizzle Shittz. Man that used to make me laugh.


28 posted on 06/06/2019 11:06:51 AM PDT by greyline90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I just have a feeling he wants this sentencing foolishness over. His attorneys keep kowtowing to the DOJ attorneys who want to keep him muzzled.


32 posted on 06/06/2019 11:18:41 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Remember when we used to call him Drizzle Shittz. Man that used to make me laugh.


33 posted on 06/06/2019 11:20:13 AM PDT by greyline90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Given what we know now, he should sue his prior attorneys for incompetent defense. Seems like they employed the bleed them then plead them tactic. I estimate it cost him something like 250-400 K.

As to whom, DO NOT pick an insider group again. DeGenova would be fine but he is busy making the rounds on TV. Weisenberg would be fine. Problem is, does he have the cash to pay now. If he has to go to the pro bono route, Dershowitz may take it up as a civil rights violation.


37 posted on 06/06/2019 11:26:51 AM PDT by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson